Might this be the first almost externally complete Barracuda submarine (the Suffren) at Cherbourg? Note the X-plane tail, which no other French submarines have. Photo recorded May 7, 2018 courtesy le marin.
---
Following the previous article - the main reason for the delay in launching France’s new Barracuda SSN is the delay in developing an adequate reactor for Barracuda. On the Barracuda is English wiki but see French article with important added content. France does not have the advantages of Britain in relying on some US technology transfer to develop world's best practice reactors for submarine.
If the testing on the not yet launched Barracuda has not been completed by 2020 it will be difficult for Naval Group to adequately design and "cut steel" on a settled Australia's Future Submarine prototype by Australia's 2022 milestone.
France's current K-15 reactor (fitted to the Triomphant class SSBN - see sidebar) is reportedly 42 years old (see page 54 at [1] below). The K-15's old age may be a pointer to how slowly a new reactor (project started in 2003? [1]) adequate for Barracuda may be developed.
This slow development of a new submarine reactor may have been limited by France's policy of using dual (civilian-military) use nuclear facilities reliant on low enriched Uranium [LEU] <20 235="" nbsp="" reactor="" solutions.="" span="" u="">20>
Instead of the K15's 7-10 year till Uranium refueling cycle (which means lower submarine availability), France may be aiming for at least 15 years between refuels. This is still short of the full and modern 33 year life of submarine reactor core solution being used in US and UK submarines which require Highly Enriched Uranium of around 90% U235. Under the 1958 US–UK Mutual [Nuclear] Defense Agreement (see 3rd paragraph) Britain has drawn heavily from US submarine reactor technology from the beginning.
France does not want to repeat some UK reactor deficiences. France would have observed Britain's problems using Vanguard SSBN's PWR2 reactor in the Astute SSN. More specifically the mismatch between the powerful PWR2 and Astute's undersized steam turbine has prevented Astute reaching full power [2]. That British PWR2 will only drive the Astutes at a deficient speed of 29-30 knots when around 35 knots would fulfil Astute's mission requirements. The opposition, Russia's Akula (see sidebar) and Yasen can travel at 35 knots.
French Submarine Reactor Table Based on [1] page 54.
Class using reactor | Reactor on French Nuclear Submarine |
Redoutable class SSBN | |
Rubis class SSN | CAS48 = K48) Rated at 48 MW giving just 7 MW propulsion (confirmed here). For submerged speed of 25 knots). K48 must be recharged every 6 to 7 years |
Triomphant class SSBN | Resulting fleet reactor: K15. The K15 design may go back to 1976 that is 42 years by 2018. [see page 54 [1]Lobner]. K15 rated at 150 MW. |
Barracuda / Suffren class SSN | Reactor construction started in 2003, with land test module completed in 2005. Intended to replace K15. |
[1] Information on French SSBNs and SLBMs are on pages 49-83 of Peter Lobner’s 60 Years of Marine Nuclear Power: 1955-2015 - Part 4 - Other Nuclear Marine Nations, August 2015. large PDF (around 20MB) http://www.lynceans.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Part-4_UK-France-Others-60-yrs-of-marine-nuc-power.pdf Information on K15 is mainly on page 54.
[2] see page 203 of David Ross's, The World's Greatest SUBMARINES: An Illustrated History, Amber Books Ltd, London, UK 2016.
Pete