Quantcast
Channel: Submarine & Other Matters
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2347

Virginias For Australia Rightly in Trouble

$
0
0
Pete Comment

Australian PM Albanese's and Biden's PR campaign for Virginias the US Navy desperately needs, being sold instead to Australia (which has good reasons not to fight China) is rightly in trouble. China will be the dominant power in Australia's region while the US remains President-by-President unpredictable (a la Trump) perhaps on the way to isolationism.

The US will only sell the Virginias to Australia if there is an ironclad understanding Australia will continue to be an ever loyal following the US into battle.

Australia should forego the A$250 Billion cost of up to 5 Virginias if that locks Australia into following the US into a war with China. Australia later buying/building SSN-AUKUS in the 2040s has not been costed by the Australian Government, but may well be another A$250 Billion.

REPORT

Part of Matthew Knott'sSydney Morning Herald, July 28, 2023 report is:

The “‘A risk we should not take’: Republican resistance mounts to [AUKUS] nuclear submarine plan

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has declared he remains confident Australia will secure Virginia-class submarines from the United States, even as almost half of all Republican senators came out against the current plan on the grounds it would dangerously weaken the US Navy as it competes with China.

Twenty-three Republican senators, including Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell, wrote to President Joe Biden on Thursday (Australian time) saying they did not support the proposal to provide nuclear-powered submarines to Australia unless the US doubled its own domestic production capacity.

...While noting that the AUKUS pact had broad bipartisan support in Washington, the senators wrote: “The administration’s current plan requires the transfer of three US Virginia-class attack submarines from the existing US submarine fleet without a clear plan for replacing these submarines.

“This plan, if implemented without change, would unacceptably weaken the US fleet even as China seeks to expand its military power and influence.”

The Republican senators noted that the US said it required 66 attack-class submarines, but the number of boats in its fleet is set to decline to 46 by 2030.

“Under the current AUKUS plan to transfer US Virginia-class submarines to a partner nation before meeting the Navy’s own requirements, the number of available nuclear submarines in the US submarine fleet would be lowered further,” they wrote.

“This is a risk we cannot take.”

Roger Wicker, the top Republican on the Senate armed services committee, previously vowed to block the submarine transfer unless the Biden administration funded a massive increase in the US domestic production capacity.

The letter shows these concerns are widely held among Senate Republicans.

The senators say in their letter the US would have to produce up to 2.5 [Virginia] submarines a year – up from 1.2 boats currently – to make up for the sale of up to three submarines to Australia and avoid shrinking the US Navy’s operational capacity..."

MUCH MORE IN THE SYDNEY MORNING HERALD REPORT


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2347

Trending Articles