Quantcast
Channel: Submarine & Other Matters
Viewing all 2365 articles
Browse latest View live

Brazil finally launches conventional Scorpene submarine Riachuelo

$
0
0
Brazil's first Naval Group Scorpene submarine Riachuelo finally launched on 
December 14, 2018. (Photo courtesy Mauro Pimentel/AFP/Getty Images via  DefenseNews)
---

Almost as a piece of devotional archeology, Submarine Matters (in 2014 and more usefully in 2015) has been reporting on Brazil's delayed, interrupted, Naval Group overseen, conventional and nuclear submarine program. The program is called PROSUB and less polite names. 


It is heartening that Brazil's first Scorpene, Riachuelo (S40) laid down in 2010 was launched December 14, 2018One cannot blame Naval Group for Brazil's delayed program. 

Brazil's conventional sub program is about 5 years behind schedule, mainly due to Brazil's peculiar system of defense budgeting. The system goes something like - if insufficient money in Year A's defense budget, then no submarine building progress in Year A. 

Naval Group produced some of Riachuelo's sections in Cherbourg, France. Then, to save time, Naval Group went to the trouble of flying them to the Brazilian assembly yard in 2012. 

Brazil currently operates 5 Tupi class Type 209 submarines.

Due to standard first of class delays, and Brazil's defense budgeting system, Riachuelo's
 commissioning may be in 2021. 

Launch of the 3 remaining Scorpenes may occur every 2 or 3 years (ie. 2021, 2023 and 2025). 

No.     Name            Laid down                Launched      Commissioned              Based

S40     Riachuelo       27 May 2010                     2018           maybe 2021             Itaguai, Sepetiba Bay

S41     Humaitá         1 Sept 2013                 maybe 2021      maybe 2023             Itaguai, Sepetiba Bay

S42     Tonelero         maybe 2021                maybe 2023       maybe 2025            Itaguai, Sepetiba Bay

S43     Angostura       maybe 2023                maybe 2025      maybe 2027             Itaguai, Sepetiba Bay

Pete

China May Have Tested JL-3 SLBM - US Eventually in Range

$
0
0
Bill Gertz of the Washington Free Beacon, (with frequent access to the most pessimistic interpretations of US alarm-int) December 18, 2018 announced what may be a partial test flight of a Chinese JL-3 submarine launched ballistic missile (SLBM). 

[Comment: This article appears to hype the many unknowns of the future JL-3 and future Type 096 SSBN. Both may only be operational in a decade. The US DoD China Military Power 2018 Report (15 MB, PDF) indicates on page 29 "China’s next generation Type 096 SSBN, reportedly to be armed with the follow-on JL-3 SLBM, will likely begin construction in the early-2020s."]

Highlights of the announcement include: a JL-3 test flight occurred in late November 2018. 
[Comment - But apparently the test was only in the rather closed waters of the Liaoning [Region]   Maritime Safety Administration near Dalian. Suggesting only a "cold launch" (ie. no rocket motors provided thrust).] 

The JL-3 will be 10 MIRV capable and may have a 7,456 to 8,700 mile range, from bastions within the First Island Chain capable of hitting most of the continental US. The JL-3s are being developed for China’s future Type 096 SSBNs (expected to be operational by the mid-to-late 2020s) but JL-3s may be used earlier, in existing modified Type 094 SSBNs. 

The test launch may have been from a Type 032 Qing classtechnology testbed submarine. The Type 032’s fin/sail may contain 2 or 3 missile launch tubes, reportedly enlarged for JL-3 tests.

The one and only 6,000+ tonne Chinese Type 032 Qing class submarine, in 2013. Note very long sail/fin - thought to accommodate vertical launch system (VLS) tubes for missile tests. (Photo courtesy Chinese Military Review)
 ---

Type 032 in an "August 2017" photo, with a higher/enlarged rear of sail/fin, maybe for longer VLS to test a longer/higher JL-3 missile. (Photo courtesy the December 2018 Washington Free Beacon article.)
---

The reportedly solid-fueled JL-3 may use technologies from the DF-41 land-based ICBM. The JL-3 may be comparable to the US/UK Trident II D-5 and Russian Bulava SLBMs.

The JL-3 may utilize advanced precision guidance technology with anti-jamming capabilities, may be variable trajectory, and may have fast burning rocket motors that seek to reduce the heat signature picked up by US warning satellites to track and target JL-3s.

“China's current sea-based nuclear force includes four Type-094 missile submarines, each outfitted with "16" missiles [more likely 12]. Internet reports from China have stated that the future Type-096 will carry up to 24 missiles - similar to numbers at one time carried by Navy Ohio-class missile submarines. Current U.S. missile submarines [may] carry 20 missiles each.”

By contrast, the next generation U.S. missile submarine, the Columbia-class, will carry 16 missiles.
[There may be a] growing possibility of offensive nuclear cooperation between China and Russia." so “Washington needs to retain the flexibility to increase the number of missiles carried by the future Columbia class SSBN."
SEE WHOLE WASHINGTON FREE BEACONARTICLE

Japan Buying Around 190 F-35s. Some for F-35B aircraft carriers

$
0
0

Japan on December 18, 2018 announced Japan’s Izumo-class “helicopter destroyers”will become true aircraft carriers by hosting F-35B STOVL stealth jets. Japan hasn’t wielded true carriers since 1945.

By coincidence the Izumo class's second ship is JS Kaga. An actual World War Two Imperial Japanese Navy carrier was called IJN Kaga.  IJN Kaga was sunk at the Battle of Midway.

Japan on December 18, 2018 announced that it would change its defense guidelines and buy:

-  105 more F-35As (in addition to the 42 F-35As it is already buying). So totalling 147 F-35As, and

-   40 F-35Bs (about 20 for training and 10 each to operate off JS Izumo and Kaga.

These around 190 F-35s for Japan will make Japan the second largest F-35 owner in the world after the US itself.

Japan said it would alter the flattop decks of Izumo and Kaga to handle weight, heat and blast when operating F-35Bs. 

Japan's carrier decision is in the face of rising threats from China, Russia, and North Korea. Also its reacting against US President Trump tweets that Japan is not paying enough for Japan's own defences.

Japan had originally sought F-22 long-range, stealthy air superiority fighters to replace its aging F-4 Phantoms and F-15 Eagles. US refusal to export F-22s means Japan has had to settle for F-35s. Japan has made some gestures toward developing its own stealth jets (equivalent to F-22s). But the costs and difficulties of developing Japanese stealth jets have been too great for a serious project.

Japan’s extra F-35 buying strategy is also arms buying trade-diplomacy to increase the chances that the more powerful US formidable armed forces (in Japan, Okinawa, Guam and South Korea) will protect Japan.

Australia

This F-35B purchase by Japan may also influence a possible future F-35B purchase by Australia. This is noting Australia is buying 72 F-35As and has two Izumo sized flat top Canberra class LHDs already fitted with ski-jump bows for STOVL jets. See 5th paragraph down in the Design and capabilities subsection.

Pete

Excellent Youtube on Virginia class SSN capabilities.

$
0
0

Don't worry about the German Type 212A start frame. This is about US Virginia SSNs.
---

After 4 minutes of hype this August 2017 Youtube settles down to a considered account of the Virginia class submarine's capabilities:

-  4 minutes in - Development at Electric Boat, Groton, computer-aided design

-  5 min, 28 sec - simulation of an underwater explosions against the submarine hull

-  6m 10s - launch of USS Texas (SSN-775) in 2005

-  6m 30s - on board sensors continuously monitor the air supply. Turning seawater into clean air.

-  8m - Uses HY100 pressure hull steel

-  8m 22s - Russia's supercavitating nuclear armed (?) Shkval torpedo threat.

-  9m - seeing and hearing enemy first is the key.

-  9m 44s - simulated firing of a Mark 48 torpedo.

-  11m - Possibly aided by US intel gathering the US was developing a "Barracuda"
    supercavitating torpedo answer to the Shkval rocket powered torpedo in the early 2000s? The
    Barracuda "outruns its own sound waves" so is silent to the target submarine's sensors.

   [Comment: But the Barracuda's noise may deafen its own on-board sonars! Maybe the Barracuda
   torpedo was shelved(?). Or maybe the US is quietly relying on stocks of old or improved VLS or
   torpedo tube launched nuclear SUBROCs as revenge rockets?]

-  13m - If stealth means wanting to be "a hole in the water" maybe anti-sub sensors may be looking
   for that atypical of sea conditions hole?

-  13m 40s - the (radar, sonar and optical) vulnerability of conventional subs (old and new) that
    need to surface or snort to take in air for their loud diesels to recharge their batteries.

-  15m 20s - Vivid illustration of the sonar research that goes on in the lakeside Bayview, Idaho,
   Acoustic Research Detachment (see earlier Submarine Matters'article)

-  17m 55s - the anechoic tiles/layer placed on the outside (and sometimes inside) submarine hull

-  18m 20s - uses of the subs sonars

-  19m 10s - location of the sub's sonar arrays

-  20m - the spherical bow sonar array being able to hears ships "1,000 miles" away. Ends.

Pete 

Funny Christmas Quotes and Thankyou

$
0
0
A lovely Christmas Carol from far away.
---


Thankyou everyone who has read Submarine Matters during 2018. And thankyou all who have commented. In 2019 I aim to move to Adelaide, South Australia, where most of Australia's naval ship and submarine building is to happen.

The social situations of Christmas are often funny. Here's a list of what some might have quipped in the past.

“Santa Claus has the right idea. Visit people only once a year.”– Victor Borge

After a good Christmas dinner one can forgive anybody, even one's own relatives. - Oscar Wilde

So we put up the National Christmas Tree to celebrate the birth of Jesus. But we won't take it down. It can stay up to celebrate MY Birthday in June. – Donald Trump

“I stopped believing in Santa Claus when I was six. Mum took me to see Santa in a department store. Then Santa asked me for my autograph.”– Shirley Temple

“Aren’t we forgetting the true meaning of Christmas. The birth of Santa?”– Matt Groening

“There ain’t no Sanity Clause”– Chico Marx

“I bought my kids a set of batteries for Christmas with a note saying, toys not included.” 
Bernard Manning

"Christmas is a time when you get homesick, even when you’re home." - Carol Nelson

Wretched, guilty, excess is an unfortunate human trait that turns what should be a quiet, peaceful, Christmas season into a crazy frenzy of shopping. – Radar O'Reilly


Christmas Shopping: I think its wonderful to buy all my friends a gift that doesn't need dusting, but is practical and personal. So I bought all my friends Gift Certificates for flu shots.
 Dagwood Bumstead

“What kind of Christmas present would Jesus ask Santa for?” - Salman Rushdie

 “There are some people who want to throw their arms round you simply because its Christmas; there are other people who want to strangle you simply because it is Christmas.”– Robert Lynd

"At Christmas, Santa's presents are compulsory. Relatives are optional.” ― Santa

Wishing everyone all the best over Christmas and in 2019.

Pete

South Korean Destroyer Confrontation with Japanese P-1 MPA

$
0
0

Anonymous commented December 23, 2018 that a South Korean (SK) destroyer [1] locked its weapon-guidance radar onto a Japanese Navy Kawasaki P-1 Maritime Patrol Aircraft (MPA). This occured twice for several minutes on December 20, 2018 within the Japanese EEZ [2-3]. See complexity of location statuses in Map below.

The SK Navy said the radar irradiation was used being used, on December 20, 2018, to search for a North Korean ship in distress.

Japan’s Ministry of Defence (MoD) does not believe the SK explanation and believes the radar lock-on was intentional. This is because a weapon-guidance radar is not suitable for surface search purposes [5]. Japan’s MoD feels SK Navy conducted a hostile act against a friendly country. This SK act breeds distrust between Japan and SK.





[5] SK Gwanggaeto the Great destroyers are equipped with complex sensors (see wikipedia right sidebar) including a:
-  Signal Tracking and Illuminating Radar (STR) for weapon-guidance. This was used to track or
   “paint” the P-1. According to experts STRs are not used for surface search, and 
-  AN/SPS-55 radar for surface search.

Pete Comment

Distrust remains between South Korea and Japan partly due to unresolved disputessince Japan’s occupation of Korea which ended in 1945. Several of the disputes include islands and territorial waters and so includes the Destroyer-MPA confrontation.

Japan and South Korea are not enemies but they are not friends.


Map: Pete Comment - This South Korean hani new agency map, illustrating the destroyer-MPA confrontation, reflects the complexity of  different territorial statuses to which was added the complexity of the destroyer's differing radar functions.
--- 

Anonymous and

Have a Happy New Year
from Pete

Israel Sold Kamikaze UAVs to China - Upgraded Harops Next?

$
0
0

The Israeli developed IAI Maritime Harap UAV in action - slamming itself into on water targets. This version has many uses: autonomous loitering anti-radar, remote controlled hits on warships, civilian ships, boats and against SEAL Delivery Vehicles. Israel sold an earlier version (the Harpy) to China.
---

In response to Lee McCurtayne's January 1, 2019 comment

China is getting into undersea and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in a big way under the label Artificial Intelligence (AI).

China is becoming able to mass produce small-medium sized, highly programmed, then autonomous, UAVs - in future to saturate the Yellow, East China and South China Seas.

Even small (1+kg) - medium (50-1,000 kg) UAVs can be weaponised, like unmanned Kamikazes to slam themselves into ships and other targets. 




A current example is the Israeli developed IAI Harop (photo above) "loitering munition" with a 23kg warhead and a radius of acction of 6 hours, 1,000 km each way.

Harops have already been used in Azerbaijan (Nagorno-Karabakh conflict) in April 2016 against Armenian troop carrying buses. Also the Israeli Defence Force has used a Harop to destroy a Syrian Air Defence SA-22 Pantsir missile on 10th May 2018.
   
Harops have autonomous anti-radar guidance. So, when Israel (against US wishes) sold some to China (as happened with the earlier, smaller, IAI Harpy in 1994), one or more could be capable of slamming itself into a South Korean, Japanese, US, Taiwanese, Indian or Southeast Asian warship.

Harop's are superior to Harpy's in terms of the latest re-programmable electronics, being more stealthy and sea and land launchable from containers. China may be willing to offer Israel money Israel can't refuse for whole Harops or at least the design plans.

A country (eg. China) operating a Harpy or Harop could "false flag" its identity (perhaps "becoming" South Korean or Japanese) before crashing into a warship - thus creating a political crisis (known in Russia as a "Putin wedge") between democratic countries. 


See Submarine Matters, November 28, 2018 article where just 2 South Korean operators can control a whole swarm of UAVs/"Drones".

Happy New Year

Pete

China to be First to Soft Land Probe on Far Side of Moon. Space Race?

$
0
0

In the stirring soundtrack Chinese Youtube (above) a Chinese Long March-3B rocket blasts off, on December 8, 2018, carrying China's unmanned Chang'e-4 lunar probe with a Moon Rover for a soft landing mission on the far side of the Moon.

The Long March-3B (see Wikipedia right sidebar) is 55 meters tall and weighs 426,000 kg. This might be compared with the US Falcon 9 rocket (70 meters tall, weighing 549,000 kg) used for cargo resupply to the International Space Station (ISS) and other uses.

Will a manned space race re-ignite? This time between China and the US?

Even now the US and Chinese space agencies seem to be competing in the media for achievement announcements. On January 1, 2019 NASA announced a major milestone in the New Horizons probe mission. By announcing now NASA may be intentionally deflating the coming Chinese announcement of  Chang'e-4 lunar probe landing on the Moon, due to happen January 2 or 3, 2019.

Unlike NASA's last Mercury blast off in the 1960s astronaut on ground exuberance Chinese Mission Control in 2018 is professionally quiet (not even mission chatter) in the China Youtube, as though no mission is happening. Cultural differences?


Chang'e-4 entered a planned orbit on December 30, 2018 to prepare for the first-ever soft landing on the far side of the moon, the China National Space Administration (CNSA) announced.

Chang'e-4 has entered an elliptical lunar orbit between 15 km and 100 km from the Moon's surface said CNSA.

US Apollo 8 astronauts were the first humans to see the far side of the Moon with the naked eye when they orbited the Moon in 1968. 

All of the manned and unmanned soft landings so far have taken place on the near side of the Moon. 

China's Chang'e 4 spacecraft is scheduled to make the first soft landing on the far side on January 2 or 3  2019.

See previous two Submarine Matters' articles on China's superpower space achievements:

Chinese Manned Spacecraft Docking Glory, February 17, 2012, and

Pete

Need for US S-3A Vikings Against Chinese and N Korean Submarines

$
0
0
See this January 3, 2019 Business Insider Australia article for a re-examination of the possible need to bring back the US S-3A Viking. This would be particularly against Chinese, North Korean, Iranian and Russian submarines.

If Vikings again operated off nuclear US carriers (CVNs) they could again fill many roles in ASW, electronic monitoring, aerial refueling and longer range loitering response to enemy shipping and boats (using Harpoons).

--------------------------------------

Separately:


This Youtube originally from the 1990s, predicts (1 minute 20 seconds in) further CVN use of the Viking for a decade or two. This of course didn't happen as US Navy retired the S-3 Viking in January 2009. F/A-18s (and now EA-18G Growlers) have taken over all jet roles on US nuclear carriers. F-35Cs (along with some EA-18Gs) may replace F/A-18s in all CVN jet roles.

Pete

My 1st Australian Ancestor was a "hard-driving" Scottish Captain

$
0
0

The Murray (1,019 tons) clipper ship was my great great grandfather's, Captain William Begg's, largest command from 1869 to 1872. (Painting courtesy 
State Library of South Australia via wikimedia.)
---

Submarine Matters mainly deals with matters undersea. But have I told you my great great grandfather, Captain William Begg, was my first ancestor in Australia. Sadly there were no submarines available in the years he sailed. So he was a surface "skimmer".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Begg :

"Begg [born 1821] in Montrose, Scotland, was apprenticed as ship's carpenter and served as a seaman for several years before around 1840 being put in charge of a cargo boat shipping timber from the Baltic.

In 1855 he was appointed captain of the Sebastian (426 tons) on the India route, calling in at Adelaide [South Australia] and Mauritius on the return voyage.

His next appointment was as captain of the Orient Line clipper Coonatto trading between England and Adelaide from 1863 to 1866, 


[Coonatto] was known as a fast ship, described by Basil Lubbock as "an out and out clipper with very fine lines."   Lubbock says that she was "very wet," which means that she took a lot of water on board when under sail, but he thought that this might be due 
"to the hard-driving of her skipper, [Captain] Begg, a Highlanderwho never spared her and made some very smart passages out and home."  

Coonatto's fastest times were 66 days to the Semaphore Lightship [Adelaide] and a 70-day run, even after losing both her helmsman and ["the wheel" another man] overboard after broaching-to (falling foul of the wind) off St Paul's Island! 
[In that same storm Captain Begg had both his legs and also some ribs broken!]

when he was put in charge of the clipper/"liner" The Murray, on which he served until 1872, making very good voyages, and impressing his passengers with his urbanity and sailor-like qualities, an asset to the reputation and no doubt profitability of the Orient Line.

He settled in Adelaide and was made manager of the Tug Company, then was appointed ship's surveyor for Lloyd's of London. In 1877 he and John Legoe had a part in formation of the Port Stevedoring Company,[1] and he served with that company until a few weeks before his death [in 1889"]"


Recognition

https://www.revolvy.com/page/William-Begg  :

"Begg was awarded a silver medal by the Italian government for his part in rescuing sailors from a burning vessel.[1] This was the Mannin Barabino, which caught fire while sailing from Genoa to Puerto Rico in May 1870. 
Begg and the crew of The Murray went to her aid and did what they could to rescue survivors, but 120 perished either in the inferno, the barque's cargo being largely [flammable alcoholic] spirits, or in the sea after her overloaded boat capsized."

Captain Begg's favourite sailing and Happy New Year song:

Robert Burns 1789 "Anthem" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auld_Lang_Syne#Lyrics

"I

Should auld acquaintance be forgot,
and never brought to mind?
Should auld acquaintance be forgot,
and auld lang syne [meaning "
for the sake of old times"]

Chorus:
For auld lang syne, my jo,
for auld lang syne,
we'll tak' a cup o' kindness yet,
for auld lang syne.

II
And surely ye'll be your pint-stoup!
and surely I'll be mine!
And we'll tak' a cup o’ kindness yet,
for auld lang syne.


III
We twa hae run about the braes,
and pou'd the gowans fine;
But we've wander'd mony a weary fit,
sin' auld lang syne.


IV
We twa hae paidl'd in the burn,
frae morning sun till dine;
But seas between us braid hae roar'd
sin' auld lang syne.


V
And there's a hand, my trusty fiere!
and gie's a hand o' thine!
And we'll tak' a right gude-willie waught,
for auld lang syne."

Pete

Glorious Chang'e-4 Mission. China Now Own Far Side of Moon.

$
0
0
Following Submarine Matters' pulchritudinous article of January 2, 2019, we the rucky of the workers paladise shout "Glory to:

-  China, 
-  democratically elected Communist Party,
-  Esteemed Leader for Life
-  to lovely Nigella (see below) and 
-  all peace-loving volunteer spaci-mens of Chang'e-4 lunar probe "

for soundly beating Aging American Apollo Astro-codgers to far side of Moon - only 50 years later.

A healthy space program is a positive sign of our superpower status, along with China having the second largest economy, second largest defense budget, largest consumer and producer population and highest cheap energy consumption in the world.

We land on it, we own it! See Youtube proof from English BBC mature babe, with totarry sexy voice, below.



Although Nigella sounds better, and see Nigella do better than rick her fingers here?!

US Apollo 8 astronauts were the first humans to see the far side of the Moon with the naked eye when they orbited the Moon in 1968. 

----------------------------------------------------------------




The Apollo Program owed much of its success to ex-SS Nazi Wernher von Braun, who contributed heavily to the booster rockets for the US Mercury, Gemini and Apollo space programs. Coincidentally 1 minute, 32 seconds into the Youtube above, Tom Lehrer says Wernher von Braun is "...learning Chinese." :-)

Until today all of the manned and unmanned soft landings so far have taken place on the near side of the Moon. 

See previous two Submarine Matters' articles on China's superpower space achievements:

Chinese Manned Spacecraft Docking Glory, February 17, 2012, and


Pete

SK Destroyer versus Japanese Aircraft Issue Spreading to Submarines

$
0
0
Following the South Korean Destroyer Confrontation With Japanese P-1 MPA originally happening December 20, 2018 [tensions between the Japanese and South Korean navies remain strong]:

Anonymous advised January 5, 2019 that Japan's Ministry of Defense (J-MoD) seems to be furious at the South Korean (SK) Department of Defense [SK-DoD] [altering a] Youtube video. [1]

The J-MoD may release the shape of SK Fire Control radar wave, "but it wll be useless for the SK Navy." 

"This radar issue, typical anti-Japan feeling of SK is beyond the responsibilities of the J-MoD and should be treated comprehensively, systematically and calmly by the entire Japanese administration, not just by J-MoD, to provide an effective result." 

Last year, the SK Navy dared to request from the J-MoD [acoustic stealth and Lithium-ion Battery information[??] on Japanese submarine operation for use in SK's new 3,000 ton Jang Bogo submarine KSS-III 
Program] . 

The J-MoD will never assist SK in this submarine data provision. In fact, Mr Masahisa Sato, defense supporting counsellor of Japan's [Diet/Parliament] Lower House and an ex-Commander of the Japanese Army questioned what the main target of this submarine was [2].

[1] On January 4, 2019 Tri-ring seriously could not believe the SK-DoD recently released a doctored/altered Youtube Video version of a Youtube originally/earlier released by Japan. The SK-DoD had actually doctored the original to add some voice. The SK DoD released video https://youtu.be/4dpWAWpzWyEYou’ll hear 3 mins 35 secs someone state something in Korean.

On the original Japanese video "https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=s93-l68D3Eo at around 0:45 seconds in, there is the same scene you only hear Japanese language voice.

"Now how in the world did that Korean message get in there after Japan had released the Youtube?"

[2]https://twitter.com/SatoMasahisa/status/1077794023803301888 [Tweet in Japanese but right-click mouse to Translate].
“Basic design of next 3000 tonne class submarine completed, start building at late 2019 = SK https://jp.yna.co.kr/view/AJP20181226000800882
“According to announcement of SK, this submarine is built to respond to threats from all directions and six ballistic missiles with range of 500 km can be installed. I wonder who the main enemy of this submarine is.”


Anonymous and Tri-ring with some additions by Pete in [...] brackets

Curous Droid explains How Australia Helped Save Apollo 13

$
0
0

Paul Shillito, an Englishman, of Curious Droid describes how Australia's Parkes radio telescope worked in record time to help reverse America's Apollo 13, near disaster in 1970.

This story follows this comment of January 5, 2019.

Pete 

How Australia Helped Save Apollo 13

$
0
0

As the submarine world remains pretty quiet at the moment, here is an Australian technical achievement:

Paul Shillito, an Englishman, of Curious Droid describes how Australia's Parkes radio telescope worked in record time to help reverse America's Apollo 13, near disaster in 1970.


While it is operated primarily for astronomy research, the Parkes, New South Wales, Australia, radio telescope has a long history of being contracted by NASA and other international space agencies to track and receive data from spacecraft:
·       In 1962 it tracked the first interplanetary space mission, Mariner 2, as it flew by the planet Venus, and in 1969 it was a prime receiving station for the Apollo 11 mission to the Moon.

  • In 1970 it was called in to help during the Apollo 13 emergency when an explosion crippled the spacecraft while it was en route to the Moon, and its Apollo support continued until the end of the manned lunar missions in December 1972.

  • In the 1980s the Parkes telescope was used to receive signals from NASA's Voyager 2 spacecraft and the European Space Agency's Giotto spacecraft, and in the 1990s it supported NASA's Galileo mission to Jupiter.

  • In the 2000s it tracked various spacecraft at Mars, and in 2005 Parkes was used in an experiment to directly receive signals from the European Space Agency's Huygens spaceprobe as it descended through the atmosphere of Saturn's largest moon, Titan.

  • Most recently, in 2012, Parkes played a support role in tracking NASA's Curiosity rover during its descent onto the Martian surface.

The fictional film 'The Dish' was based on the real role that the Parkes telescope played in receiving video footage of the first Moon walk by the crew of Apollo 11 in 1969.




The Parkes radio telescope.
---

This story follows my comment of January 5, 2019.

Pete 

Youtube of USS South Dakota's Trials

$
0
0

Published on Youtube a few days ago, January 4, 2019. Filmed on November 27, 2018.  (Film Credits courtesy  SSG Alexander C Henninger and SrA Jared Bunn via Gung Ho Vids )

Above is exterior and interior footage of the Pre Commissioning Unit (PCU) 
South Dakota(SSN-790), and a dive manoeuvre sequence from the control room.  South Dakota is the seventeenth Virginia-class submarine to join the USN.

36 seconds in - walking through a narrow cental corridor

56s - large by submarine standards galley. Where the crew seems to be hanging out, off duty. 
         Not hanging out in the torpedo room like in old SSKs.

1m 11s - bunks are still cramped

1:39 - senior petty or officer in control room declaring trial operating-diving

1:47 - while on surface submarine is operating in 2,500m water “beneth the keel”. 

1:56 - submarine will submerge to "155 feet" = 47m

2:24 - diving

3:00 - famous dolphin "fish" pin.

BACKGOUND

USS South Dakota (SSN-790) will be commissioned at Naval Submarine Base New London in Groton, Connecticut on February 2, 2019. 

South Dakota is a Block III Virginia. see on List. At Wikipedia:

PropulsionS9G reactor 40,000 shp (30 MW), Test depth+800 ft (240 m), 
Displacement7,900 metric tonnes.

Pete

Virginia Block V versus Columbia SSGN Issues

$
0
0


Advances in whole of service life reactors may justify just 12 Columbia's, but cost, flexibility and anticipating future threats must also be factored into higher numbers of Columbia SSBNs.

Virginia Cost (Wikipedia): $2.7 billion per unit but then a total of $3.2 billion per unit with VPM. Meaning adding the Virginia Payload Modules (VPM) on Virginia class Block Vs will cost an extra US$500 million to total US$3.2 billion all up per Block V Virginia submarine. 

Building Block Vs with VPMs may depend on whether 4 or 5 Columbia class SSGNs are built! A Columbia SSGN may have 16 multipurpose Virginia/Columbia Payload Tubes (V/C PTs) (x 6 Tomahawks) with each Columbia SSGN having 96 Tomahawk SLCMs. 

Building 4 Columbia class SSGNs may allow flexibility to retrofit each V/C PT to fit Trident II SLBMs. This would help the US face unexpected increases in opponent SSBN or conventionally propelled ballistic missile submarines (SSBs) meaning that planning to meet the Russian SSBN threat is no longer the whole picture.

The US needs to factor in also meeting:

- 10 to 14 modern Chinese Type 096 and then 098 SSBNs all armed with JL-3 SLBMs, and 

-  North Korean, Pakistani and Iranian nuclear missile carrying SSBs 

Pete

Australia's Barty Beats World No.1 Simona Halep in Tennis

$
0
0

As submarines are naturally related to tennis, with joy I report: Australian Women's tennis player

Ashleigh Barty (ranked 15th in world) in first Youtube frame and white tennis skirt (above)

has just beaten world No.1 Simona Helep in the

Sydney International Tennis 2019 competition in straight sets 6-4, 6-4.

Oh day of national rejoicing :-)

Pete

Russia May Develop a 4,500km, 1 tonne warhead "Kalibr-M" missile

$
0
0
COMMENT

In a TASS article of January 8, 2019 (republished below) probably builders-sellers-marketeers of Russia’s domestic Kalibr-export Club/Klub cruise missile have:

issued a marketing-request for funding-propaganda report about a very vaguely labelled ship-submarine launched land-attack “Kalibr-M”.

"Kalibr-M" may by the late 2020s become a double the current (approximate 2,000km) range ie. 4,500km, heavier 1 tonne warhead, enlargement of the current 3M-54 Russian Kalibr missile. This new Kalibr is touted as being nuclear capable - but almost any weapon (from Russian 40kg, 152mm artillery shells upwards) are nuclear warhead capable.

To illustrate that reports of a double the 2,000 km range Kalibr have been kicking around for a while see on Wiki see Domestic variants, last dot point. specifically a 2015 reference to “range of 4,000 km” Kalibr.

The current Kalibr (and export Klubs) can be launched on land, by aircraft, ship VLS or by submarine VLS or 533mm torpedo tube.

If "Kalibr-M"is to have a diameter greater than a horizontal 533mm, or more rare 650mm, torpedo tube or becomes too long its usefulness for conventional submarines and many nuclear submarines will decline sharply.

Russian submarines have a long history of vertically and diagonally launched missiles that are larger than 533mm, So an enlarged “Kalibr” might be launched vertically and/or diagonally by the late 2020s.

Russia has many discontinued or current:
- larger than 533mm cruise missile types to serve as a technology base for an outsized missile body
   and
- deployed many different rocket and/or jet engine combinations for cruise missiles. 

One current cruise missile is the P-800 Oniks a 0.7m diameter and 8.9m long cruise missile. 32 Oniks in VLS might be carried by Russia’s new Yasen class multi-purpose SSGNs. While the The Oniks’ overall supersonic speed and only 400kg warhead are very different from a double range, 1 tonne warhead Kalibr the Oniks may provide a useful technology base.

So it is possible the “Kalibr-M” will be a more-cruise-turbojet reliant, and less-rocket engine-sprint reliant Oniks cruise missile.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

TASS Articlehttp://tass.com/defense/1039123January 8, 2019

"New Kalibr-M cruise missile with range of over 4,500 km in development in Russia - source

According to the source, large surface ships will be equipped with it, starting with frigates, as well as nuclear submarines.

MOSCOW, January 8. /TASS/. New Kalibr-M cruise missile with a range of over 4,500 km is currently under development in Russia for the Russian Navy, a source in the military-industrial complex told TASS on Tuesday.

"The newest high-precision ship-based Kalibr-M cruise missile with a maximum firing range of more than 4,500 km is being developed for the Russian Navy. The creation of the rocket is at the stage of scientific research and financed by the Ministry of Defense," the source told TASS. The source clarified that the development of the missile was included in the state armament program until 2027, and "the rocket must be transferred to the fleet before the end of the program."

The source added that the new missile will differ from the existing Kalibr missiles in service both in terms of its longer range and dimensions. "It will be much larger, the weight of its warhead will approach 1 tonne," he noted. According to the source, large surface ships will be equipped with it, starting with frigates, as well as nuclear submarines. "Kalibr-M is designed to destroy land facilities [known as “land-attack”] and will be able to carry both conventional and nuclear warhead," he said.

TASS does not have official confirmation of the information provided by the source.

At present, Kalibr missile system is in service with the Russian Navy. According to data from open sources, the maximum firing range of a 3M-14 cruise missile from this complex, flying at subsonic speed, reaches around 2,000 km.”

Newsweek also reportedon the Kalibr-M on January 8, 2019.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


See from 40 seconds in about Russia's Kalibr cruise missile generally. Submarines are particularly mentioned 3min 50secs in.
---

Pete   

Future Kalibr-M Most Likely a P-1000 Vulkan/Vulcan Development

$
0
0
Following Russia May Develop a 4,500 km, 1 tonne, “Kalibr M”Missile [for ship/submarine launch] of January 9, 2019

KQN made the insightful comment:

“Russia's air launched stealthy Kh-101 is already speculated to have a range of 4500km. It flies at 6km altitude for the majority of its flight path. Its diameter is supposedly compliant to 533mm. So kalibr variant of similar range is clearly feasible even on a much earlier timeframe if sufficient funds are available.”

In response Thanks KQN. Yes Russia's Kalibr-M Project is like the P-800 Oniks also likely to benefit from existing work on the Kh-101 Air Launched Cruise Missile.

In terms of missiles actually launched from ships and submarines, another supplimentary candidate as a technology beginning for the Kalibr-M is the the P-500 Bazalt https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-500_Bazalt (NATO name "SS-N-12 Sandbox"). Specifications include:

- 4,800kg, 11.7m long, 0.88m diameter, 1 TONNE WARHEAD (a specific spec for the Kalibr-M).

- turbojet powered (but can go "Mach 2.5"!) so trading off this high speed (with only 550 km
  range) for longer range may help attain Kalibr-M's 4,500 km requirement

- in terms of submarines Bazalt was used on the Soviet Echo II SSGNs and Juliett class SSK



Above is a modern development of P-599 Bazalt, known as the P-1000 Vulkan (or Vulcan) (main source Wikipedia and footnotes 4 to 8 belowsubmarine launched cruise missile (SLCM). So P-1000 Vulkan (or Vulcan) may be a logical technology start for the "Kalibr-M".


"An improved version of the P-500 was installed on three Echo II [SSGNs] towards the end of the Cold War.[4] The P-1000 Vulkan (GRAU 3M70) presumably has the same firing range and maximum speed with the P-500 Bazalt (range 800 km[5]). The missile weight was increased by 1-2 tons. The missile has a turbojet engine and a starting powder accelerator. High-altitude flight regimes are presumably the same as that of P-500.[6]

The P-1000 was ordered on 15 May 1979[4] from NPO Mashinostroyeniya Chelomey;[4] it first flew in July 1982[4] and was accepted for service on 18 December 1987.[4] It was installed on three Echo II [SSGNs] of the Northern Fleet between 1987 and 1993; the conversion of two units of the Pacific Fleet, the K-10 and K-34, was abandoned due to lack of funds.[4] Of the submarines that did receive the P-1000, the K-1 was decommissioned after a reactor accident in 1989, the K-35 was stricken in 1993 and the K-22 in 1995.[4] The P-1000 has been installed on the Slava class cruiseVaryag,[7] and some sources report P-1000 missiles on her sister ship Moskva.[8]

     Naval Institute Press. p. 246.
8.  "US Navy's presence counters Russia's Black Sea fleet". Georgia Today (566). 17 June 2011.
     Archived from the original on 2 January 2012."


In the Youtube above is a simulated modern SSGN submarine launch of a P-1000 Vulkan (or Vulcan) missile for land attack (ticking many of the Kalibr-M boxes). Russian language:

1 sec - design bureau
7sec - diagonal submarine launch
12s - aircraft for test flight and/or targeting
22s - diagonal test launch from surfaced submarine. Evident is initial launch rocket motor dropping
        off with handover to turbojet
55s - Echo SSGN(?) or Yankee class testsub(?)

1m10s - graphic submerged diagonal (allowing submarine to move at approx 10 knots - which is
              faster than submarine speed during a vertical launch) launch of Vulkans
1:24 - animation, Vulkans rising to 24 km (78,740 feet) for efficient long range travel (?)
1:35 - submarine launched Vulkans (like future Kalibr-Ms) land attacking coastal targets 
1:42 - looks like 1970s-80s footage of Bazalt/Vulkan loading into Yankee class "SSGN"(?) test sub
2:04 - Submarine Pennant Number "160"?
2:14 - Likely Oscar class SSGN with side mounted diagonal launch silos
2:40 - successful test firing
2:48 - subtitle referece to "K-420" which is a Yankee class
3:10 - probably discontinuation of Bazalt/Vulkan advances in 1989 when Mikhail Gorbachev ruled
          over dissolving Soviet Union defense budget
3:50 - need for longer range Kalibrs for Russia's missions in Middle East. Importance of oil/gas trade
4:45 - time of Donald Rumsfeld (pictured) SecDef 2001-2006 US very active in MidEast.
5:01 - need to keep up with American submarine missile development. [Perhaps Russians are
          expecting a longer range development of the Tomahawk
          - maybe the Next-Generation Land-Attack Missile (NGLAW) ]

5:56 - launch of Yasen(?) (around 2010) (imprimatur of Putin presiding) and/or Akula SSGN the
           most likely submarines to carry advanced P-1000 Vulkans for land attack
6:10 - Akula?

Anyone who can add further meaning to the Russian Youtube (while citing Youtube minutes and seconds) are welcome. Comments welcome, of course. 

CONCLUSION

So the P-1000 Vulkan/Vulcan anti-ship and land-attack missile was developed and deployed on submarines during the disruption of the Soviet Union in the 1980s (dissolution of the Soviet Union 1991). 

As for many complex (now Russian) weapons' programs that disruption continues to this day. By associating itself with the successful Kalibr family (as the "Kalibr-M") the P-1000 Vulkan may again get funding to modernize it. This is given the tight Russian Defense Budget where many programs are competing for money and attention.

So the "Kalibr-M" (was P-1000 Vulkan) can be again put in production for wider deployment. 

Pete

US B-2, B-52 and B-1 Bombers Exercising in Australia

$
0
0


Continued US B-2, B-1 and B-52 bomber visits, in and over Australia, are important to Australia's security, particularly against the likes of China. 

In a low key way the very isolated  Australia’s Tindal Air Force Base at Katherine, Northern Territory, Australia, occasionally hosts US B-52B-1B, B-2 (probably at night) bombers and KC-135s on scheduled operations, exercises and emergency stops. 

The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF's) Darwin Air Force Base can also host (Youtube above) US bombers, (though less frequently than Tindal) due to noise and perhaps security concerns. These bombers and refuelers are more frequently based or pass through Guam, Okinawa, Diego Garcia, Hawaii, Middle East and Afghanistan bases and mainly based on the US mainland.

A B-2 stealth bomber lands at RAAF Darwin, Australia, foExercise Green Lightning. 2006-2012 (Photo Courtesy, Air Power Australia).
---

Another facility shared by the US and Australian air forces is a bombing range south of Tindal. 

Bombers from US Andersen Air Force Base, Guam historically used the very small, uninhabited, island of Farallon de Medinilla just north of Guam as a practice target. But political, environmental sensitivities, very small size and other limitations means that US heavy bombers no longer bomb Farallon de Medinilla.

Instead bombers from Guam can use the larger, 200,000 hectare Delamere Air Weapons Range about 120 km south of Tindal. See Wiki and Australian Defence websites on Delamere.

Under the defence relations Enhanced Air Cooperation (EAC) initiative, Exercise Lightning Focus has been held from November 2017 (if not earlier). Lightning Focus may be applicable to more or all RAAF bases in Australia particularly RAAF Williamtown (near Newcastle, NSW) and Australian RAAF Amberley (near Brisbane-Ipswich) Queensland.



In early 2018 US B-52s touched down at RAAF Base Darwin to train with the RAAF as part of the Enhanced Air Cooperation initiative.
---

All sorts of Australian RAAF aircraft participate in these exercises (AEW&C, air refuelers and fighter-attack, etc) 


Two B-1Bs from 37th Bomber Squadron, South Dakota, land at RAAF Amberley, Australia,
November 27, 2017. The B-1Bs are participating in RAAF led Exercise Lightning Focus. Lightning Focus is the largest international air forces exercise in Australia, held in 2017 and 2018. 
---

All these US aircraft visits are important to Australia's security.

Pete
Viewing all 2365 articles
Browse latest View live