Quantcast
Channel: Submarine & Other Matters
Viewing all 2365 articles
Browse latest View live

What Taiwan's future submarines could be used for - Part 2.

$
0
0
Taiwan's submarine squadron is very much orientated to defend against a Chinese seaborne invasion or at least a naval blockade. The shortest China to Taiwan distance is the 100 nautical mile wide Taiwan Strait


An excellent source is Professor Anthony H. Cordesman’s lengthy “Chinese Grand Strategy – A Net Assessment: Cooperation, Competition and/or Conflict” Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Revised November 28, 2018, (10 MB, PDF) https://csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/181129_China_Grand_Strategy.pdf?ai0W91VgZ6to6jAXR4dp256k4wH_ljEb . The link was kindly sent to me by GhalibKabir.

On page 253 Professor Cordesman quotes an estimate of 72 Chinese attack submarines (SSK and SSN's) by 2020. This is versus Taiwan's 2 x 34 year old Hai Lung class submarines. Taiwan's new submarines are only likely to be commissioned from 2027 at the rate of one per year. This means 4 Taiwanese submarines in 2030 may need to face 72 Chinese submarines of equal (Song class) or superior Yuan  class SSKs and Shang SSNs. If Trump's isolationist trend typifies subsequent Presidents then Taiwan may not be able to rely on US SSNs adding to the anti-China force.

In any case a cross Taiwan Strait invasion may be more directly influenced by land based missiles - where China is also vastly superior (Table below). China's cruise and SRBMs-MRBMs are mainly land attack missiles. Such missiles are suitable because of the short range nature and well designated targets in the Taiwan Strait theater. Such Chinese missiles could saturate Taiwanese land and ship targets leaving submerged Taiwanese submarines as one of the last methods of defence.

The US DoD estimates that in 2019 China will have up to 540 land based cruise missiles and almost 2,000 SRBMs/MRBMs. All of these could be launched well back from the Chinese coast enabling them to hit Taiwanese land targets. In the case of cruise missiles and the DF-21D MRBMs they will be able to hit moving Taiwanese targets including surface ships and submarines at sea. (Table courtesy US DoD via FAS). 

By their submerged invisibility Taiwan's submarine can cause hesitation and doubt in Chinese ships invading or blockading. These submarines may also be a last line of defence if Taiwan is laid waste by missile strikes. The increasing availability of  loiter (or sit on the seafloor) then attack torpedos/AUVs/UUVs launched from submarine torpedo tubes can utilise a possible Taiwanese undersea sensor advantage(?)

Use of submarine fired Harpoon missiles as land attack weapons against Chinese cities is a sensitive option which may draw a devastatingly angry response from China.

A factor that may diminish the relative contribution that 4 modern Taiwanese subs (in 2030) could make in the Taiwan Strait is their likely absence from the Strait. This is because almost all of the Taiwan Strait is only 200m deep, or less (see map above). This makes operations of 4 Taiwanese submarines too dangerous but in contrast favouring 50+ Chinese submarines prepared to absorb some loses. (See map much larger courtesy Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.)

Taiwan may have an advantage in Taiwanese or US laid seabed sensor arrays in the Taiwan Strait. This does not mean wide-oceanic SOSUS arrays but Reliable Acoustic Path (RAP) aka Fixed Distributed Systems (FDS). RAP/FDS are more concentrated sensors suitable for closed water/chokepoints like the Taiwan Strait. As they can detect and identify Chinese subs and ships travelling just above them they can act as sensor components of  weapons systems. They can do this  by communicating data by raised buoy-to-satellite or undersea cable to Taiwanese shore bases - with the satellites or bases alerting/cueing weapons platforms. Such weapons can include land, submarine or patrol boat fired torpedos, anti-ship missiles, missiles that carry anti-submarine torpedos or depth charges, or the RAP/FDS being directly hooked up to bottom rising mines. 

Of course the picture of Chinese supremacy in submarine numbers is more complex than 72. China's Navy is divided into three "Theater" or "Fleets" all with different tasking. It is the Eastern Theater Navy (aka "East Sea Fleet" ) above Headquartered at Ningbo, that would most directly deal with the Taiwan Strait. The Eastern Theater Navy has 18 SSKs, no SSNs, 44 surface ships and many MPAs and helicopters capable of finding and sinking Taiwan's 4 modern subs (by 2030). (Map of Major Naval Units, courtesy US Defense Intelligence Agency, China Military Power 2019
page 68.)

Like South Korea, Taiwan is way too close to an over-armed opponent.

Pete

Coalition Election Win Good for Naval Group Submarine Build in South Australia

$
0
0
The win for Australia's Morrison Coalition Government over Shorten's Labor Party on May 18, 2019 means continuity for Australia's future Attack class submarine project with Naval Group remaining main contractor.

The Coalition retained all of its electoral districts/seats in the key submarine building state of South Australia meaning most of the build will stay in South Australia.

A Liberal Party candidate within the Coalition even won an additional seat (Boothby) in Adelaide, South Australia. This makes it even more important to the Coalition of having most of the submarine build continue in South Australia.

Before the Election there was a general expectation that a Shorten Labor Government would win. Such a win might have caused a broad review of Naval Group winning the major contractor position in the submarine build. The so-called "leaking", in mid May 2019, of compensation payment details if the deal with Naval Group broke down can in retrospect be seen as a quietly authorised warning to Labor not to break the deal with Naval Group.

REASONS WHY THE COALITION WON

After suffering 5 Prime Ministers in 9 years Australians were not ready for a new won. Retaining the incumbent, Scott Morrison, while not perfect, satisfies the need for continuity. In the election campaign Morrison preached JOBS, LOWER TAXES and ECONOMIC STABILITY rather than Labor's call for HIGHER TAXES and idealistic measures to reduce CLIMATE CHANGE.

Labor carried a false assumption that most Australians rate CLIMATE CHANGE as a near main or main concern. That assumption seems to be a minority, usually leftwing view, of those wealthy enough not to worry about their jobs. The Election results point to more Australians feeling that manmade climate change, if it exists, being a very longterm (100+ year) change with the small Australian economy responsible for only 1.28% of world greenhouse gas emissions. 

The Australian media are making a big thing of the "unexpected" defeat of Shorten's Labor Party. But Shorten was ONLY AHEAD of the Liberal/National Party (L/NP) Coalition by 1 to 2% in the pre-Election SURVEYS.

Some call Morrison a "Conservative". But he is a CENTRIST appealing to a broad group of voters. He could easily be a Democrat on the American scale.

Labor was particularly hurt in the northeastern state of QUEENSLAND when Labor and Greens from the southeastern states of Victoria and New South Wales wanted to cancel, for Climate Change and rare species reasons, the future, massive, Adani-Carmichael coal project. Queenslanders resented these southerners and rated more highly the Coalition's push for Adani's future jobs and its positive impact on Queensland's economy .

Also Labor did poorly in WESTERN AUSTRALIA where mining, oil and gas are job creaters even if this impacts Labor's concern for the environment.

Finally SHORTEN lacks charisma and hence is UNPOPULAR with the electorate compared to Morrison.

Bill Shorten concedes defeat on May 18, 2019 Election night and, at the same time, he resigned from the leadership of the Labor Party (Photo courtesy The Canberra Times).
---

Pete 

Can failed election candidate ex-General Subianto Rule Indonesia by Martial Law Instead?

$
0
0
Will the Indonesian Army step in to restore order in riot torn Jakarta, Indonesia’s capital? Can former General Prabowo Subianto, who failed to win the Presidental Election exploit this?

On May 21, 2019 the incumbent Joko Widodo (a man of non-military background) was democratically re-elected President of Indonesia.

But the losing candidate, former General Subianto, has “refused to accept the election results and [has] declared himself the winner”. This has encouraged mobs in Jakarta to riot today.

The Indonesian police have attempted to contain the riots with 6 people killed and 200 injured. Might the situation escalate to use of the Army to restore order?

Many in the Indonesian Army believe they a born to rule particularly ex-members of the Indonesian Special Forces (Kopassus). Kopassus is notorious for taking the law into its own hands. Subianto just happens to have been a Commanding General of Kopassus from December 1995 to March 1998.

Subianto just happens to have a record of fomenting riots with the intention of using his military forces to “restore order”.


"Less than three months after his appointment as head of [Army Strategic Command (Kostrad)], on the first day of the May 1998 riots, [General Prabowo Subianto] urged the commander of the Indonesian National Armed Forces, Wiranto, to let [General Prabowo Subianto] bring his Strategic Reserve units from outside Jakarta into the city to help restore order.

Hundreds of men trained by Kopassus (Prabowo's former command) were flown from Dili to Yogyakarta in chartered planes, and then on to Jakarta by train. [General Prabowo Subianto] publicly urged Indonesians to join him to fight "traitors to the nation".

On the morning of 14 May [1998], Kopassus troops escorted young thugs from Lampung in southern Sumatra into the capital. Thus [General Prabowo Subianto] was accused of using his contacts in his former command to import and create trouble, while Wiranto had declined to give Prabowo's current command, Kostrad, permission to quell the existing trouble, in line with classic Javanese tactic to stir chaos to discredit a rival and/or seize power."

So now in 2019 will former General Prabowo Subianto, after failing to gain power by democratic means, associating himself with troops who “restore order”. Could he, in the long run, rule by martial law?

Ex-General Prabowo Subianto choosing to wear quasi-military dress during his 2019 Presidential Election Campaign (Photo courtesy SCMP)
---

Pete

US's Zero-Yield Nuclear Tests - Russia Blamed for Doing Similar?

$
0
0
Lieutenant General Robert Paul Ashley Jr, Director, US DIA, is not saying much when he assertedlate May 2019:

"The United States believes that Russia probably is not adhering to its nuclear testing moratorium in a manner consistent with the zero-yield standard."

This is given the US successfully performed a "zero-yield nuclear" tests in Nevada, 2017 to the present day:

“Scientists at Sandia National Laboratories claim to have successfully tested an upgraded version of the B61-12 nuclear bomb.

The US has been working on the B61-12 for several years, and government officials say the latest tests are vital to refurbishing efforts.

An F-16 from Nellis Air Force Base in March successfully dropped a zero-yield version of the bomb over the Nevada desert. It left a "neat hole" and crews were able to dig it out of the dirt for further study.

Sandia Stockpile Resource Center Director Anna Schauer said, "It's great to see things all come together: the weapon design, the test preparation, the aircraft, the range and the people who made it happen."

Scientists will spend the next several months analyzing data gathered from the test flight.

Officials say the US is planning more test flights over the next three years, and the B61-12's first production unit is scheduled to be completed in 2020.

The current B61-12 consolidates and replaces four older versions in the nation's nuclear arsenal.”


Youtube: Testing of the B61-12 nuclear bomb in mid 2018. Narrative kicks in at 20 seconds. Bomb device technical details very interesting from 2 min 37 secs.
---

The official legal - technological definitions of nuclear weapons testing are highly complex, ambiguous, even contradictory and include:

"zero yield" safety tests of warheads, whether the test is successful (there is no nuclear yield) or the test is unsuccessful (there is a nuclear yield). It does not include hydronuclear, cold or subcritical tests because no nuclear explosions are possible, even in failure. In these sorts of tests there may be small amounts of chain reaction occurring, but they stop before materially adding to the chemical explosion that causes them. 

The line here is finely drawn, but, among other things, subcritical testing is not prohibited by the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, while safety tests are...

Maybe Russia like all other legal and illegal nuclear nations (India, Pakistan, North Korea, not to mention Israel) continues to conduct “zero-yield” nuclear tests?

Pete

Osborne Naval Shipyard, Adelaide - Security Observations

$
0
0
Aerial view of part of Osborne Naval (Ship and Submarine) Yard, Adelaide, South Australia. Osborne and North Haven residential suburbs can be seen at left upper corner. 
(Photo courtesy Ship Technology .com.) 
---

Over the last 2 weeks Pete has been checking out housing and facilities round about Osborne Naval Shipyard in northwest Adelaide, South Australia.

Pete's Security Observations


There is a boom in Osborne's construction and upgrades of Australia's: Hobart class destroyers; Arafura class offshore patrol vessels; future Hunter class frigates; and Collins and future Attack class submarines. Osborne has therefore become a high value intelligence hotspot. Hence predictable growth:


-  in size and number of consulates-general (basically mini "embassies" - perhaps housing 

  "diplomats", defence and press attaches who collect naval intelligence in Adelaide). China's 
   and Russia's consulates-general? ;
-  in numbers of foreign engineering/scientific academics and students capable of collecting intel
   and establishing lasting sensitive friendships at Adelaide universities, and
-  of course, harder to detect non-official-cover "illegals" (not only Russians and Australian
   "moles".

Shipbuilding institutional awareness of physical security (aided by the isolated nature of Osborne facilities) looks reasonable. 


But aggressive sigint/cyber hacking can nullify facility security and even personal security of smartphones, tablets and home PCs.


"Good" humint approaches can also persuade bosses, employees and contractors to divulge Top Secret information- maybe less likely at beginning of careers. More likely coercion and/or inducements can persuade some to divulge increasingly sensitive information that they gain access to 5+ years into their careers. 


Such information could include secrets originating from the US eg. via the Raytheon office at the shipyard and via Lockheed Martin's Adelaide office offsite at Mawson Lakes, UK and French via Naval Group (on and offsite at Keswick Adelaide). 


Pete 

Lithium-ion Batteries May Make Australia's Attack-class Submarines Superior

$
0
0
Australia's Derek Woolner and David Glynne Jones have written an excellent article for The Strategist

That is "Future-proofing the Attack class (part 1): propulsion and endurance" June 14, 2019 - at

Which begins:

"A major challenge in the decades-long program to build the Royal Australian Navy’s new submarines, the Attack class, will be ensuring that they incorporate emerging transformational advances in propulsion technology.

Between 2025 and 2030, the continuing rapid evolution of lithium-ion battery [LIBs] technology will enable the Attack-class boats to stay fully submerged on low-speed patrols for up to 40 days without recharging. By 2035, that could increase to up to 60 days. And by 2050, it’s conceivable that the next generation of light-metal batteries will enable the boats to go on an 80-day long-transit mission without the need to resurface and recharge..."


Please read the WHOLE ARTICLE 

PETE POINTS INSPIRED BY THE ARTICLE

All this depends on Australia choosing LIBs rather than older style lead-acid batteries for the Attack class... 

The oft criticised slow rollout of the future Attack class may be beneficial in being able to encompass and fully exploit mature LIB technology. This is especially true if total battery size could be around 1,200 tonnes within the very large 4,500 tonne size of the Attack class. This is noting the Collins total lead-acid battery size is 400 tonnes.

1,200 tonnes is also possible due to much less need for full loads of diesel fuel. If an Attack class sub can complete its whole mission on battery far less diesel fuel will be required. Diesels will primarily become return-to-port emergency propulsion - similar to the emergency diesels on all nuclear propelled submarines.

For example the future French Barracuda SSNs, on which the future Attack class are based, carry two emergency diesels. Also lower range 600 kW MTU 12V 4000s may already serve as emergency backup/return-to-port diesels on nuclear powered UK Astute class SSNs (see right sidebar).

Australia's economy and naval budget will remain too small for the alternative option of  nuclear propulsion. Even with much higher GDPs India's indigenous Arihant class SSBNs and Brazil's  indigenous future SN-BR SSN have experienced severe delays/problems in building and/or proper maintenance.  

US-Australian advances in large land based power grid-LIB technology will accelerate development of Attack class LIBs.

Unlikely Brazil transfer of Tupi submarines to Argentina will work

$
0
0
There are so many obstacles to Brazil's offer of old Tupi Type 209 submarines to Argentina that the deal may well not come off as planned.

So Santiago Rivas, for Jane's Defence Weekly, June 10, 2019, reported
 https://www.janes.com/article/89163/brazil-to-transfer-type-209-submarines-to-the-argentine-navy

"The Brazilian Navy has agreed to transfer two Tupi class submarines – Type 209/1400 – to Argentina, following a meeting between Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro and his Argentine counterpart, Mauricio Macro. 

The deal includes a potential future transfer of an additional two boats. The first two could be transferred during 2019 and the ships would then receive some "minor" repairs at Tandanor shipyard in Argentina before entering service in 2020.

The Tupi class of four vessels was commissioned between 1989 and 1999 and is slated to be replaced by the four Tonelero-class submarines of the Scorpene type in the near future."

BACKGROUND/ARGUMENTS

Since ARA San Juansank in November 2017 Argentina's now has just one very old, semi-active submarine, ARA Santa Cruz, which was commissioned way back in 1984. In the following  Submarine Matters is directly citing some Portuguese-Brazilian language sources.

Meanwhile Brazil 5 Tupi class subs are reportedly non operational with S Tupi (commissioned 1989) being cannibalized for spare partsBrazil's S Tikuna (S-34), arguably a Tupi, was commissioned in 2006, and probably not being offered.

Given the sporadic state of repairs the 3 available Tupi's (Tamoio (S-31) commissioned 1995, Timbira (S-32) 1996 and Tapajó (S-33) 1999) have aged quickly and are in need of extensive repairs and upgrades


Argentina’s naval shipyard (Tandanor) chief Jorge Arosa (unlike other Argentine admirals and officials) is not enthusiastic about the Tupi deal as he believes the Tupis are far less capable/smaller than ARA Santa Cruz. Arosa also says he has is no idea of the true cost of repairing and refurbishing the Tupis.

Over the years Argentina and Brazil have been the competing strategic powers of South America. Some of Brazil's admirals are reluctant to give Argentina 2 to 4 Tupi submarines that could be returned to operations in the Brazilian Navy. So far just one of Brazil’s new class of Scorpene submarines (S Riachuelo (S 40)) has been launched and even it may not be commissioned until 2023.

Not to be forgotten is Argentina's ongoing dispute with Britain over the Malvinas/Falkland Islands. Brazil ultimately may be unwilling to supply submarines to Argentina if there is a chance these subs may sink British ships in a future Malvinas/Falklands conflict.

So all in all Brazilian President Bolsonaro may have made a fine political gesture in offering Tupis to Argentina, but Brazilian and Argentine officers may effectively scuttle the deal.

Pete

Pete's Poetry Published......Here!

$
0
0
MOVE TO ADELAIDE? 
(where the new subs will be built)

Two wretched days drive
Good sense denied
Keep awake
Stay alive

Long, lonely road
Sleep interrupted
Navigation mode
Signal corrupted

Inland drought Lawson-esque tragedy
Real poverty Narrander[y] 
Town centre’s dead
Grey shops long closed
Nary McDonalds nor Kentucky Duckexposed

South Australia confronts
Drought in Barossa, 11mm rain in 4 months
A weekend veneer
Wine tastings all queer

10 days in Adelaide
Midwinter sleet
Little sleep
Tiredness creeps

Adelaide’s Semaphore shore
Sun dancing on sea
Signs of my ancestors nostalgic spree
A plaque by the water on Semaphore Road reads

To “those gallant Sea-captains
[who] visited Port Adelaide...

"They that go down to the sea in ships,
That do business in great waters,
These see the works of the lord.
And his wonders in the deep."
PSALM CV11.23.24”

List of sea-captains on plague begins: “Capt. William Begg
Begg is/was my great-great Grandfather,
Dour Scot of warm heart
His 2 legs in a storm broken apart

From Glasgow to Adelaide, he sailed 1855
Then settled in Adelaide 1870s alive
Harbour Master of Port Adelaide, before dying 1889
With his Ghost I shared a tumbler o’wine.

Both my parents, 7/8ths Protty Scotties watch out!
Were born in Adelaide neither devout.
Shared the same Jewish Grandmother, an outsider
Her existence suppressed. No memory provide her

So I blissfully returned to New South Wales
Occasional place of gales, whale tales
A place of optimism, warmth and friendship for free
Where I carry on Scottie Captain’s love of the sea.


ALTHOUGH I VOTED LABOR...

A bliss not to see Shorty’s
Dweeble mug on TV

Shorten name
Short in luck
Feet with flippers
Runs like duck


MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY will  Beggineth
(With a little help from Eric Idle)

Life is like a yacht in the Caribbean. It’s alright if you have one.

Me life as a failed pessimist.

Of course I have my faults, but you won’t read about them here.

Writing about yourself is an odd mix of therapy and lap dancing; exciting yet a little shameful.

I was destined to be schooled in the lowest of the low, but they wouldn’t take me.


MINE OWN STANZA

Here I sit good sense denied
Excess booze last night imbibed


Pete

Iranian Nuclear Weapons Program: Site-Meter "Hacking" Iranian Interest

$
0
0
Map of Iran's highest priority nuclear facilities. This includes the research centers at Tehran and  Isfahan/Esfahan (from which Submarine Matters' site-meter picked up Iranian reader interest in computer simulations of nuclear weapon explosions) see below. 
-------------

The whole bomb Iran issue is dominated Israeli and US politicians-officials. Most effectively the US National Security Advisor, John R. Bolton (from the years he worked for Reagan, to the present day). 

Repetition of "when not if we should bomb Iran" commentary is usually unhelpful in the absence of first hand data. By the time data reaches these commentators it is often highly distorted and third or fourth hand. The following research and some analysis is intended to fill part of the void in knowledge.

Submarine Matters direct technical monitoring of  the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran (AEOI) as far back as 2006 reflects Iran's ongoing interest in nuclear weapons research as an option for Iran. The AEOI is active in many university institutes, cities and isolated sites in Iran, particularly in Tehran and Isfahan (aka Esfahan) a large city about 350 km south of Tehran.

The Isfahan University of Technology (IUT) is closely related to AEOI. IUT includes the Nuclear Technology Center (INTC) (run by the AEOI) with an estimated 3,000 scientists   http://www.nti.org/facilities/237/ . INTC has many nuclear functions including Uranium enrichment. INTC operates three small nuclear research reactors supplied by China.

Like all research communities the Iranian nuclear community uses internet searches for general and specific purposes. Internet search for sensitive nuclear topics involves inherent security risks for searching organisations - so sensitive internet searches require good reasons. One of those reasons from mid 2006 was Divine Strake. In mid 2006 the US Government announced that it intended to conduct a large, non-nuclear, high-explosive test known as "Divine Strake" at the US Government's Nevada (nuclear) Test Site. The test would use hundreds of tonnes of conventional explosive to simulate a low nuclear yield bunker buster test of the type that might be useful one day against deep dug Iranian nuclear facilities.


The prospect of a Divine Strake test created considerable interest in the Iranian nuclear community in 2006-2007. The point of interest for Iran was probably that Iran might be the likely target of US weapons. Iran might also benefit from conducting zero yield nuclear tests along with super
computer simulations (noting the evident interest below). These simulations might be one of a number of productive avenues for Iran's own nuclear test program as they might partly avoid the need for Iran to conduct actual nuclear tests, down the line, if it wanted to. 

The Iranian nuclear community therefore began to conduct some pointed internet searches to discover what the American's were doing. Using my website and a simple, free site-meter, Submarine Matters began to detect and collect some searches by employees of Iranian Atomic research institutions. Although the US Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) officially canceled Divine Strake in February 2007 some interesting Iranian Google search results were gathered as detailed below. If readers are accustomed to using simple site-meters or even professional metadata collection they will have a handle on the significance of the following.


In 2006 Google revealed to commercial site-meters the words used by readers in keyword seachers. By 2016 Google began to disguise the precise keywords.  


Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran (AEOI) Employee Google keyword searches detected by Submarine Matters' site-meter include:

- July 21, 2006 (IP 80.191.142.11) "Esfahan", conducted Google search for "deep bunkers MOP" MOP means Massive Ordinance Penetrator  (a large US bomb useful for blowing up deep dug high value targets including nuclear facilities)

   
- October 30, 2006 (IP 217.218.11.165) "Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran""Tehran"  employee googled "what is nuclear simulation". Comment - literally revealing "Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran" as the Iranian ISP is clearly poor security. One can now conclude that 217.218 is an "Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran" IP number even if "Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran" is disguised with bland ISP names.  

- November 19, 2006 (IP 217.218.64.202) Atomic Energy Organization of Iran disguised as "Area No 6 Partition""Tehran", conducted a Google search for "nuclear explosion simulation".


- March 4, 2007 (IP 213.176.127.82) from - "Iranian Research Organization" employee googled key words "simulation underground nuclear explosion".

- September 9, 2007 (IP 217.218.64.202) Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, employee googled information on "nuclear weapon effects computer".

- October 23, 2007 (IP 217.218.64.202) Atomic Energy Organization of Iran employee googled information on "nuclear weapon effects computer".

- November 13, 2007 (IP 217.218.64.202) Atomic Energy Organization of Iran employee googled information on "underground nuclear explosion"

- November 22, 2007 (IP 217.219.18.13) a reader from Isfahan/Esfahan University of Technology, Tehran campus, detected as reading information on Submarine Matters concerning "Indian and Pakistani nuclear missiles".

- June 3, 2010 (IP 83.147.213.101) a reader in Isfahan/Esfahan Googled 
Submarine Matters for information on the SILEX laser uranium enrichment process.

Information collected above on Iranian interest in "nuclear weapon effects computer" prompted me to do further research on supercomputer upgrades at the Isfahan University of Technology. In 2011 the then President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad reportedly unveiled a supercomputer at Isfahan University of Technology - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isfahan_University_of_Technology#Research_and_facilities . 

A supercomputer has many uses including complex physical and chemical reactions that occur in nuclear explosion simulations. Such simulations demand the enormous speed and capacity of supercomputers. By 2011-2012 the Iranians are likely to have conducted nuclear explosion simulations using the supercomputer.More on Iran nuclear - see http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-11927720 and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_facilities_in_Iran  

PETE'S COMMENT

Since 2014 Iran has been at or near nuclear weapon breakout status - with the three components being:

- substantial stocks of semi-enriched uranium (LEU or MEU), which could become bomb grade (90+%) HEU within a couple of months using Iran's thousands of centrifuges and possible hidden laser enrichment capability.

- delivery means - in the form of Sejjil http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sejjil solid fuel IRBM and the  Shahab series liquid fueled IRBMs, and

- enough nuclear device plans and components acquired from Pakistan's A. Q. Khan network to have constructed crude fission devices (minus the HEU and/or Plutonium explosive) around 2006.


SAUDI NUCLEAR PROGRAM?

Iran has been building a nuclear weapon program because regional opponent, Israel, has developed nuclear weapons since the mid 1960s. 

Shiite Iran's Sunni opponent Saudi Arabia has had the potential political and financial muscle to buy nuclear weapons and missiles from Pakistan and China since the 1980s. The Saudis bought Chinese inaccurate-hence-nuclear-specific-use CSS-2 IRBMs in 1987 The Saudi's also reportedly bought from China more advanced nuclear-use DF-21 (CSS-5) MRBMs in 2007. See the Newsweek article and http://www.nti.org/gsn/article/us-backed-secret-saudi-missile-purchase-china/.


A more detailed map of Iran's nuclear sites.
---

Pete

Might India's 1950s SSN Building Dream Come True by 2050?

$
0
0
India has, since the 1950s [A],been talking about building nuclear attack submarines (SSNs). Their principal mission would be to scour the seas for enemy (mainly Pakistani and Chinese attack) submarines before and during India’s Arihant class SSBN nuclear deterrent patrol activities. India’s SSNs would particularly be a counter to China’s growing numbers of SSNs visiting the Indian Ocean.

India's highest priority may be building an Indian variant of INS Chakra's/Akula's Russian 190 MW OK-650B/OK-650M reactor.

[A]Drawing from this August 2014 Submarine Matters’ report:

India plans to build 6 SSNsto be constructed at Visakhapatnam. Few details, no date milestones. This [1990s Federation of American Scientists] report indicates India has been interested in building or buying 6 SSNs since the 1950s, with Russian assistance, for fleet protection, mainly against Chinese subs. India financed the completion of INS Chakra (ex Nerpa) (a Russian Akula 2) - is long leasing it - and commissioned it into the Indian Navy in 2012. Since commissing Chakra has been almost invisable. It may not be operational but rather a full test model for examination and trials by the India Navy, DRDO and India's nuclear reactor sector. It is likely any Indian built SSN would draw heavily on Akula 2 technology and be built with Russian assistance."

Inspired by Manu Bubby of India’s The Economic Times, June 24, 2019, most excellent reportand a mainly subsequent Wikipedia report:

India approved the construction of 6 SSNs [1]in February 2015.[2]These will be Indian designed and built with a lot of help from the Russian research and on-site advisers...at India’s Visakhapatnam Main Naval Base East shipyard. Expertise gained in the construction of the Arihant class SSBNs will be transferred to the SSN project.[5] Since India is a traditional user of Russian nuclear submarines (with INS Chakra (2011)on lease) the new domestically built submarines would be third class of SSN operated by Indian navy after leased Charlie-class submarine and Akula-class submarines.[3]All six submarines are expected to be constructed in India [ie. none in Russia] under India’s  “Make in India” Program.[1][4]
The submarines will be powered by a conventional PWR reactor being developed by the India's BARC military nuclear research center. The new reactor will be more powerful than the 83 MW Russian-BARC reactor that powers the Arihant (INS Arihant and Arighat so far) SSBNs.[3]
On June 24, 2019 , it was reported [5] that 100 crores = 100 x 10,000,000 = 1 Billion Indian Rupees = only US$14.4 million has been allocated for the initial phase of the project. With such small infusions of money since the project began in 1950s-2015 “development work would stretch beyond 2025”. Unsurprisingly the SSNs will use pressure hull steel permitting them to dive deeper than the Arihants. A scaled down model of the SSN is scheduled to begin testing soon.
References (courtesy Wikipedia)

[1]"India to Build 6 Nuclear-Powered Submarines - Navy Chief". Sputnik International. Sputnik. 4 December 2015.
[4] "India finalizing plans to order three more Scorpene submarines". The Times of India. Retrieved 2015-12-04.
[5]Pubby, Manu. "Work begins on India’s next gen nuclear-powered submarines" The Economic Times. 24 June 2019



FURTHER COMMENT

India's rather relaxed, underfunded SSN program, might commission the first basically Russian Husky (concept sketch above) derived "indigenous Indian" SSN/SSGN by 2050, if Pakistan and China are lucky.

Pete

Japan's Kamikaze class 29SS Future Submarine

$
0
0
With the Covert Shores - Popular Mechanics articles yesterday what can we learn about Japan's Future Submarine 29SS?:

29SS (see Table below) will be the lead boat in the new Japanese Kamikaze (神風 - Divine Wind) class submarine series. Mythical winds follow Japan's Oyashio (mythical currents ) and Soryu mythical dragons) class submarines.

The Kamikazes will, with the benefit of heavier, more voluminous, NCA formula Lithium-ion Batteries (LIBs) have longer (10 day) fully submerged performance .


Of course the Kamikazes (like the Australian under Attack class) will be as good as sunk against the superiority of Chinese and Russian nuclear propelled attack submarines (SSNs).

Hence Japan and Australia are currently, and will in future, be totally reliant on the whims of increasingly isolationist US SSNs to take on Chinese and Russian SSNs.

China's and Russia's increasingly sensitive fixed and mobile anti-submarine sensors demand more discrete performance from these Japanese and Australian diesel-electric submarines. But even with LIBs, these Japo-Aussie subs still need to loudly snort with supercharged diesel engines every 10 days. Thus blowing their residual discretion out of the water.

What might the new Kamikaze - 29SS class look like (courtesy H I Sutton's Covert Shores and anticipated by Submarine Matters on June 14, 2017 ):




With a pumpjet/propulsor and (Alfa, Akula slightly Type 212A) smaller, faired fin/sail on a Soryu looking hull (above). Inspired by artwork released by "Kobe Shipyard" (KHI, MHI, Japanese MoD)  via Covert Shores (below): 




Putting 29SS in Japanese sub evolutionary context:


TABLE.  Japanese Soryu and Oyashio Programs as at June 27, 2019 

SS
No.
Diesel Type
Motor
Build No
Name
Pennant
No.
MoF approved amount ¥
Billions FY
LABs, LIBs, AIP
Laid Down
Laun
-ched
Commi
ssioned
Built
By
5SS Oyashio
8105 Oyashio
SS-590/ TS3608
¥52.2B FY1993
LABs only
 Jan 1994
Oct 1996
Mar 1998
 KHI
6SS-15SS
Oyashios 
10 subs
SMC-7?
8106
-8115
various
SS-591-600
¥52.2B per sub
FY1994-FY2003
LABs only
 15SS Feb
2004
15SS
Nov
2006
15SS
Mar 2008
 MHI
&
KHI
16SS
Soryu Mk I
SMC-8
8116
Sōryū
SS-501
¥60B FY2004
LABs + AIP
Mar 2005
Dec 2007
Mar
2009
MHI
17SS
8117
Unryū
SS-502
¥58.7B FY2005
LABs + AIP
Mar 2006
Oct 2008
Mar
2010
KHI
18SS
8118
Hakuryū
SS-503
¥56.2 FY2006
LABs + AIP
Feb 2007
Oct 2009
Mar
2011
MHI
19SS
8119
Kenryū
SS-504
¥53B FY2007
LABs + AIP
Mar 2008
Nov 2010
Mar
2012
KHI
20SS
8120
Zuiryū
SS-505
¥51B FY2008
LABs + AIP
Mar 2009
Oct 2011
Mar
2013
MHI
No 21SS
No 21SS built
22SS
8121
Kokuryū
SS-506
¥52.8B FY2010
LABs + AIP
Jan 2011
Oct 2013
Mar
2015
KHI
23SS
8122
Jinryu
SS-507
¥54.6B FY2011
LABs + AIP
Feb 2012
Oct 2014
7 Mar 2016
MHI
24SS
8123
Sekiryū
SS-508
¥54.7B FY2012
LABs + AIP
KHI
25SS
8124
SS-509
¥53.1B FY2013
LABs + AIP
22 Oct 2013
12 Oct   2016
MHI
26SS
end of SMC-8s
8125
SS-510
LABs + AIP
2014
6 Nov 2017
KHI
27SS First
Soryu Mk II
diesel
first SMC-8B
motor
8126
SS-511
LIBs only
(NCA type)
2015
4 Oct
2018
Mar
2020?
MHI
28SS  Second
Soryu Mk II
SMC-8B
8127
SS-512
¥63.6B FY2016
"2,900t" class
LIBs only
(NCA type?)
2016?
Oct 2019?
Mar 2021?
KHI
29SS New Class
SMC-9?
8128
SS-???
¥76B FY2017
large budget rise for sub of
larger "3,000t" class page 3
implies many new
features. New class?
LIBs only
2017?
or
2025?
2020?
or
2028?
2023?
or
2031?
MHI
30SS New Class
8029?
SS-???
¥71.5B FY2018
LIBs only
?
?
?
KHI?
Table from information exclusively provided to Submarine MattersLABs = lead-acid batteries, AIP = air independent propulsion, LIBs = Lithium-ion Batteries. ¥***B = Billion Yen. MHI = Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, KHI = Kawasaki Shipbuilding Corporation of Kawasaki Heavy Industries. 
---

Japan's Kamikaze Klasse (29SS) Future Submarines

$
0
0
With the Covert Shores - Popular Mechanics articles yesterday what can we learn about Japan's Future Submarine class, classified 29SS?:

29SS (see Table below) with a little more color, will be the lead boat in the new Japanese Kamikaze
 (神風 - "Divine Wind") class. Such mythical winds follow Japan's Oyashio (mythical currents ) and Soryu (mythical dragons) class submarines.

Japan relied on brave Japanese pilots in Kamikaze aircraft to sink or damage allied ships in WWII, in part because of inadequate use of Japan's submarine force (see page 2, paragraph 1 of this source). It is therefore fitting that Japan's new submarines, faced with overwhelming Chinese submarine numbers and Chinese SSN qualitative superiority, will carry on such sacrifice. 

Popular Mechanics advises:

"The designation “29SS” is derived from the 29th year of the reign of Emperor Akihito, otherwise known to everyone else as 2017, and SS is the international shorthand for non-nuclear attack submarine

... 29SS retains the general hull form of earlier submarines but with some important changes. The sail is substantially reduced and blended into the hull, which should reduce hydrodynamic drag. This will make the submarine quieter, perhaps a little faster, but also more energy efficient. Non-nuclear powered submarines, operating underwater under combat conditions, must carefully manage their power or risk being forced to surface. The dive planes have also been moved from what’s left of the sail to the hull.

...The research and development phase will take place from 2025 to 2028, and the first ship of this class will probably hit the water around 2031."

The Kamikazes will, with the benefit of heavier, more voluminous, NCA formula Lithium-ion Batteries (LIBs) have longer (maybe 10 day) fully submerged performance .


Of course the Kamikazes (like the Australian Under Attack class) will be as good as sunk against the superiority of Chinese and Russian nuclear propelled attack submarines (SSNs).

Japan and Australia currently, and out to 2040, will be totally reliant on the whims of increasingly isolationist US SSN management to take on Chinese and Russian SSNs.

China's and Russia's increasingly sensitive fixed and mobile anti-submarine sensors demand more discrete performance from these Japanese and Australian diesel-electric submarines. But even with LIBs, these Japo-Aussie subs still need to loudly snort with supercharged diesel engines every 10 days. Thus blowing their residual discretion out of the water.

What might the new Kamikaze - 29SS class look like (courtesy H I Sutton's Covert Shores and anticipated by Submarine Matters on June 14, 2017 ):



With a pumpjet/propulsor and (Alfa, Akula slightly Type 212A) smaller, faired fin/sail on a Soryu looking hull (above). Inspired by artwork released by "Kobe Shipyard" (KHI, MHI, Japanese MoD)  via Covert Shores (below): 




Putting 29SS in Japanese sub evolutionary context:


TABLE.  Japanese Soryu and Oyashio Programs as at June 27, 2019 

SS
No.
Diesel Type
Motor
Build No
Name
Pennant
No.
MoF approved amount ¥
Billions FY
LABs, LIBs, AIP
Laid Down
Laun
-ched
Commi
ssioned
Built
By
5SS Oyashio
8105 Oyashio
(mythical
currents)
SS-590/ TS3608
¥52.2B FY1993
LABs only
 Jan 1994
Oct 1996
Mar 1998
 KHI
6SS-15SS
Oyashios 
10 subs
SMC-7?
8106
-8115
various
SS-591-600
¥52.2B per sub
FY1994-FY2003
LABs only
 15SS Feb
2004
15SS
Nov
2006
15SS
Mar 2008
 MHI
&
KHI
16SS
Soryu Mk I
SMC-8
8116
SS-501
¥60B FY2004
LABs + AIP
Mar 2005
Dec 2007
Mar
2009
MHI
17SS
8117
Unryū
SS-502
¥58.7B FY2005
LABs + AIP
Mar 2006
Oct 2008
Mar
2010
KHI
18SS
8118
Hakuryū
SS-503
¥56.2 FY2006
LABs + AIP
Feb 2007
Oct 2009
Mar
2011
MHI
19SS
8119
Kenryū
SS-504
¥53B FY2007
LABs + AIP
Mar 2008
Nov 2010
Mar
2012
KHI
20SS
8120
Zuiryū
SS-505
¥51B FY2008
LABs + AIP
Mar 2009
Oct 2011
Mar
2013
MHI
No 21SS
No 21SS built
22SS
8121
Kokuryū
SS-506
¥52.8B FY2010
LABs + AIP
Jan 2011
Oct 2013
Mar
2015
KHI
23SS
8122
Jinryu
SS-507
¥54.6B FY2011
LABs + AIP
Feb 2012
Oct 2014
7 Mar 2016
MHI
24SS
8123
Sekiryū
SS-508
¥54.7B FY2012
LABs + AIP
KHI
25SS
8124
SS-509
¥53.1B FY2013
LABs + AIP
22 Oct 2013
12 Oct   2016
MHI
26SS
end of SMC-8s
8125
SS-510
LABs + AIP
2014
6 Nov 2017
KHI
27SS First
Soryu Mk II
diesel
first SMC-8B
motor
8126
SS-511
LIBs only
(NCA type)
2015
4 Oct
2018
Mar
2020?
MHI
28SS  Second
Soryu Mk II
SMC-8B
8127
SS-512
¥63.6B FY2016
"2,900t"surfaced
LIBs only
(NCA type?)
2016?
Oct 2019?
Mar 2021?
KHI
29SS New Class
SMC-9?
8128
SS-???
¥76B FY2017
large budget rise for sub of 
larger "3,000t" 
surfaced
class page 3
implies many new
features. New class?
LIBs only
2017?

or

2025?
2020?

or

2028?
2023?

or

2031?
MHI
30SS New Class
8029?
SS-???
¥71.5B FY2018
LIBs only
?
?
?
KHI?
Table from information exclusively provided to Submarine MattersLABs = lead-acid batteries, AIP = air independent propulsion, LIBs = Lithium-ion Batteries. ¥***B = Billion Yen. MHI = Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, KHI = Kawasaki Shipbuilding Corporation of Kawasaki Heavy Industries. 
---


Pete

Coming Military Crackdown in Hong Kong

$
0
0

The radical rioters who stormed the Hong Kong Parliament in the past 12 hours (Youtube above) are reminiscent of the hopeful heroes who sat in Tiananmen Square in 1989. The world press are fooling themselves when they underestimate how Chinese military forces, responsible for Hong Kong, may react.

Damage to the Hong Kong Parliament provides a pretext for a paramilitary police and then a military crackdown on those (recorded on surveillance cameras and cell-phone trackers) who rioted. Perhaps a broader circle of democracy activists in Hong Kong will also be arrested.

The Beijing Government can suspend the convention that the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA) cannot interfere in Hong Kong's internal affairs. This is because the PLA has always had an underlying or active role in internal security for all regions of China. 

The 6,000 PLA troops based in Hong Kong can quickly be reinforced with several brigades of armoured vehicles from the Mainland. The PLA's Hong Kong Garrison is under the direct leadership of China's Central Military Commission and under the administrative control of PLA's Southern Theater Command.


Radical rioters (photo above courtesy Reuters) smashing into the Hong Kong Parliament. Note that the policemen behind the glass initially withdrew (surrendering the Parliament to rioter occupation) in order to provide a pretext for a more powerful crackdown soon.

Fatal Fire on Russian Nuclear Spy Submarine "Losharick"

$
0
0
On July 3, 2019 the Australian Government owned ABC News reported a fatal fire on the Russian nuclear spy submarine Losharick.

PETE COMMENT

As well as research the Losharick is a spy submarine, which conducts top secret missions. For example Losharick is used for tapping Western undersea cables (some perhaps from Australia) and laying secret fixed anti-submarine sensors in the Atlantic, Pacific and Arctic oceans. The Losharick has been described as a “small...or mini-submarine” but it is reported as weighing 2,000 tons which is a full sized submarine!

ARTICLE

The ABC News article, at https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-07-03/russia-submarine-fire-kills-14-losharik-nuclear-vladimir-putin/11273188begins:


“Fire on 'top secret Russian mini-submarine' kills 14 sailors, Vladimir Putin demands Defence briefing


The Russian Defence Ministry says 14 sailors have been killed in a fire on a navy submersible, with media reporting the stricken vessel is the country's most secret mini-submarine.
Key points:
·       Russian media reported the vessel was the nuclear-powered AS-12 Losharik, a mini-submarine
·       A Defence Ministry statement said the fire was put out thanks to the self-sacrifice of crew members
·       The incident happened near Barents Sea, where the Kursk nuclear submarine sank in 2000

The ministry did not say what the vessel was, explain how the fire broke out, or if there were any survivors.
Russian media reported the incident happened on the AS-12 Losharik, a small nuclear-powered vessel designed for sensitive missions at great ocean depths.
Russian Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu said the fire broke out while the vessel was measuring sea depths in Russia's territorial waters, and the submersible had since arrived at the Arctic port of Severomorsk, the main base of Russia's Northern Fleet.
"According to preliminary data, 14 sailors died from being poisoned by combustion products," he said.
In a televised meeting with his Defence Minister, President Vladimir Putin said two "Heroes of Russia" were among the dead, referring to the highest military award issued in the post-World War II period.
"This is not a regular vessel ... it's a scientific research vessel. It's a highly professional [Russian Navy] crew," he said.
"Seven out of the 14 dead are first-class captains, two are Heroes of Russia.
"It is a big loss for the fleet and for [the] army in general."
The Ministry said the fire was put out thanks to the "self-sacrifice of crew members" but did not say how many people were on board.
Norway [is] monitoring for radiation in Barents Sea
The blaze marks the most serious Russian naval incident since 2008, when 20 people died after a firefighting system was accidentally triggered while the Nerpa nuclear-powered submarine of Russia's Pacific Fleet was undergoing trials.
In the deadliest naval incident in post-Soviet Russia, the Kursk nuclear submarine exploded and sank on August 12, 2000, during naval manoeuvres in the Barents Sea, killing all 118 crew members.
The latest incident also took place in the vicinity of the Barents Sea, but authorities in nearby Norway said they were monitoring, but had not detected, abnormally high levels of radiation.
Per Strand, a director at the Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, said Russian officials had told his agency that a gas explosion took place on board the submarine, though Russia denied this.
Secret vessel reportedly has a unique titanium hull design
The [Losharick] was constructed and launched under a veil of secrecy, but some details of the project have been reported by Russian media.
According to an archived [Russian language] report in Russian newspaper Izvestia, the [Losharick] was launched in 2003.
It is described as the most advanced and most obscure Russian submarine and is reportedly named after a Soviet-era cartoon character — a toy horse made of small spheres.
The name is apparently explained by the unique design of its internal hull, which is made of several titanium spheres capable of withstanding high pressure at great depths.
It is reportedly powered by a nuclear reactor and was built over a 15-year period under a veil of secrecy.
None of the claims have been independently confirmed...."

24 or 36 Australian conventional submarines anyone?

$
0
0
Politicians and the public can count. 

So radically multiplying Australian conventional submarine numbers creates reader interest

Calls to radically multiply Australian submarine numbers and other weapons, is somewhat traditional - seen in Ross Babbage's 2008 "rip an arm off a giant" with perhaps 300 to 400? F-35s and 20 to 30? submarines. 

But if Australia can hardly crew and captain 6 Collins how will we handle the already planned 12, let alone 24 or 36? A more reasonable plan may be 6 conventionally propelled Attack / Shortfin class submarines operating by 2038 followed by 6 nuclear propelled Attack class (aka French Barracuda SSNs) by 2050. 

And perhaps the US and UK may be willing to pre-empt any French sale of Barracuda SSNs by offering superior (whole of life fueled reactor) late model Virginia Block V or Astute SSNs respectively.

Pete

Pete's Foggy Friday Poetical Affirmations

$
0
0
THO I VOTED LABOR...

A blessing not to see Shorty's
Sad little face on TV

Shorten name
Short in luck
Feet with flippers

...Albo-lutely

Of Hawkie's funereal rapture
He was a man short in stature
But BIG in speedo
Ladies Lined up
Ta Luv’im y'know :)


ODES TO AN ARROGANT MAL-ACHIEVER

Here I sit good sense denied
Excess booze last night imbibed.

Here I sit good sense maintained
Booze last night, I refrained.


MY AUTOBIOGRAPHY would Begg-ineth
(with a hat tip to Eric Idle)

Life is like a flash 12 metre yacht on Sydney Harbour. It’s alright if you have one.
My life as a failed pessimist.
Of course I have my faults, but you won’t read about them here.
Writing about yourself is an odd mix of therapy and lapdancing; exciting yet a little shameful.
I was destined to be schooled by the lowest of the low, but "they" * wouldn’t av me.

Pete

* [Hold it! Hold it! That last line is just silly, indiscrete, and totally lacking in literary merit, OK?! Vee haff a gut mind to permanently delete it under the Read it, Burn it, Then put out our own eyes Intelligence Act of  2???

But just don't tell anyone we did it. OK?!]

Dry "Launch" of France's First Barracuda/Suffren SSN - K15 Reactor?

$
0
0

On July 12, 2019 (Naval Group advises) a ceremony, presided over by French President Macron (above), "launched" the first Barracuda named Suffren. Suffren is the first of 6 Barracuda SSNsbeing built in Cherbourg for the French Navy. The 6 Barracudas will replace the 6 much smaller Rubis class SSNs (operating since 1983).


COMMENT

The "launch" of first of class vessels (including subs) is a highly political act (hence the French President participated). The first is generally "launched" remaining on dry land (wheeled out of its shed for the ceremony - then back in the shed again after the ceremony) not truly launched into the water. This is for a variety of reasons, including: safety, need for continued assemblage inside the sub (including fully installing the reactor). Many other technical issues (eg. electronics software and hardware and weapon systems) would still need resolution. 

First of class submarines typically take between 2 and 5 years from launch till full commissioning/operating in a navy. Commissioning follows all necessary tests and resolution of the many inevitable technical problems - especially the reactor. So Suffren might not be fully commissioned into the French Navy until 2023-24 if major problems are encountered.

ARTICLE

At the Barracuda/Suffren (hereinafter called "SSN") launch ceremony Hervé Guillou, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Naval Group, thanked all the entities involved in building the SSN, including the French Atomic Energy and Alternative Energies Commission (CEA) and
 TechnicAtome

COMMENT

These 2 French naval reactor builders may have resolved the main reason for the program's delay, ie. the development of the miniaturised (for SSN) version of the existing K15 naval reactor (mainly in Cadarache, southeast France (see map)). See Submarine Matters' previous articles on the K15 problem here and, much more detailed, here. The K15 has presumably been fitted into the SSNGuillou said the K15 reactor will first be tested (run critical?) in Cherbourg shipyard "in the coming weeks".   


The long delayed [Suffren was laid down 2007] launch is reassuring for builders of the Australian Attack-class (was the "Shortfin") conventional diesel-electric (SSK) version of the SSN. Reassuring because many of the hydrodynamic efficiency and acoustic stealth characteristics for the SSK must be first tested during the SSN's full scale submerged trials (which may begin 2021-22). Also many of the Naval Group staff (managers, designers and builders) hitherto assigned to SSN development will gradually become available for Australia's SSK development. Although we must keep in mind that many of the Naval Group's SSN staff will now also be reassigned to the new SSBN program (known as 3rd Generation SSBN - known as 3G SNLE (or SNLE 3g)) to replace France's Triomphant SSBNs (operating since 1997).]

ARTICLE - Technical Characteristics
  
The technical characteristics of the Barracuda Suffren-class SSNs, provided by Naval Group's 12 July 2019 Media Release, are:


  • Surface displacement: 4,700 tonnes
  • Diving [submerged] displacement: 5,300 tonnes
  • Length: 99 metres
  • Diameter [beam]: 8.8 metres
  • Armament: naval cruise missiles, F21 heavy-weight wire-guided torpedoes, modernised Exocet SM39 anti-ship missiles, [mines, weaponised UUVs and Naval Cruise Missiles (NCM - MdCN) for long range land attack, armed Special Forces - divers using wet or dry diver delivery vehicles/minisubs].
  • Hybrid propulsion: [propulsor-pumpjet with a secret structure, hence shrouded at launch ceremony] and pressurised water reactor derived from the [K15 (150 MW) reactors on board the Triomphant-class SSBNs [see right sidebar] and Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier [right sidebar], two propulsion turbines, two turbo generators and two electric motors
  • Crew: 65 crew members + commandos [Special Forces]
  • Availability:> 270 days per year [K15s need refueling every 7 to 10 years. There is also shorter term and longer term "deep" maintenance for many other parts of the SSNs generally.]

  • YOUTUBE



Above is an excellent (less than 7 minute) Youtube with commentary (1 minute, 3 seconds in) by Xavier Vavasseur, Chief Editor, Naval News. As well as the French President and officials Xavier mentions the presence of the Australian Defence Minister [Senator Linda Reynolds] and Australian military.
---

Pete

Australia's Future Submarines Likely To Keep Lead Acid Batteries.

$
0
0
Australian submarine expert Derek Woolner and Lithium-ion Battery (LIB) expert David Glynne Jones have warned that Australia’s future Attack-class submarines could be inferior on commissioning in the 2030s if they don’t use LIBs. This has been reported in more detail hereand here

Those countries with “superior” LIBs for submarine include Japan which is building LIBs submarines right now. South Korea and China are likely to build LIBs submarines within the next 15 years.

Bio Details

Derek Woolner co-authored The Collins class submarine story: steel, spies and spin. He has performed contractual services for Australia’s future Attack class submarine program.

David Glynne Jones is an advocate of transport electrification using renewable sources, including those hooked up to Lithium-ion batteries.

COMMENT

It appears that the Australian Government and Naval Group intend to build the future Attack class with old style, but proven, lead-acid batteries. The Australian Government are concerned that LIBs for submarines are unproven operationally and there are safety concerns that LIB batteries have a higher chance (than lead-acid batteries) of overheating, burning and even exploding if not managed properly.

The advantages of LIBs are that:

-  they can be recharged more quickly meaning quicker/more discrete snorting periods

and

-  can be hold more electrical power than lead-acid batteries. LIBs have a greater average
   charge/discharge efficiency of
85% (see LIB sidebar) compared to lead-acid batteries which have a
   lower
averageof around 72.5% (see lead-acid battery sidebar). Submarines with LIBs
   might 
prudently(ie. always retaining 50% battery capacity for rapid tactical movement
   /emergencies) snort every 5 days or more. Estimates are vary
variable. That would mean longer
   fully 
submerged submarine operation of 5 days or more. This is compared to every 1 to 2 days
   prudent snorting for subs with lead-
acid batteries.

The Attack class will use an unknown number of MTU 4000 or, perhaps less likely MTU 396 diesels.


The Australian Government has implied that it may adopt LIBs in future. Pete Comment - However this is unlikely for the first batch of 6 Attack class as LIBs require whole new space and buoyancy solutions and new electrical fittings throughout a submarine.

Pete

Losharik's Intentional Flooding and Functions

$
0
0
Many readers would be aware that on July 1, 2019, 14 of Losharik’s estimated 19 crew were killed in a fire (burns, blast, smoke inhalation) as Losharik was in the process of docking in Orenburg’s belly (“moon well” floodable chamber). Some of the following links are in French or Russian - which may translate to English automatically after 15 seconds or right-click mouse, then "Translate to English".

Few may be aware that it has been reported that Orenburg’s crew intentionally “floodedLosharik to prevent the fire/explosions spreading to Orenburg. So some of Losharik’s crew may have been sacrificed to save Orenburg's crew.

The details below mainly drawing from excellent articles by:

Igor Delanoë (working in Moscow) “Losharik: drama in the depths” July 10, 2019,

and also

Pavel Felgenhauer (also in Moscow) "‘Losharik’ Submersible Disaster Handicaps Russian Naval Operations” July 11, 2019, Eurasia Daily Monitor Volume: 16 Issue: 99, The Jamestown Foundation. https://jamestown.org/program/losharik-submersible-disaster-handicaps-russian-naval-operations/ in square [...] bracket’s :



Losharik(bottom) and above it Orenburg"mother sub" (a "Delta III Stretch BS-136). (Diagram courtesy TechnologyNewsWorld July 2, 2019).

---
First described as nuclear submarine “AS-12”  Losharik turned out to be the AS-31, deep diving special operations submarine which operates from the belly of the much larger “mother sub”
BS-136 Orenburg  (modified from Delta III class SSBN K-129 in 1994).

What is Losharik used for? 
Using her underwater mechanical hands/manipulators and floodlights, Losharikis designed to carry out many sensitive, often risky missions:


Seizing and destroying submarine cables and tapping the cables with listening devices are 2 of the functions of LosharikFor example...in March 2016, the French press reported the presence of a Russian SSBN sitting on the bottom of the Bay of Biscay.  In fact of SSBN could well have been the Losharik-Orenburg combination spotted in an area where many vulnerable submarine cables are on the seafloor.

[Losharik can reportedly sabotage the US’ SOSUS [seafloor listening device arrays] in the Atlantic [Pete addition: Pacific, Arctic and Indian] Oceans. Atlantic sabotages would allow Russian submarines to break out of their Severomorsk base into the open Atlantic undetected (RBC, July 9).] [Just before the fire Losharik’s][...crew may have been searching for intelligence-gathering equipment potentially planted by the US military on the seafloor to monitor activities in the North Sea.]

Losharik also recovers Russian warheads, other weapons systems and sensors lost (or broken) at sea. For example, if new torpedo or UAV trials fail they need to be retrieved by Losharik before they fall into the hands of a foreign power [Pete addition: probably US, UK or China]. [Just before Losharik’s fire][...the Russian navy itself had lost something during exercises. Another possibility is that this was a mission to test some new equipment, which may explain the presence of a defense industry civilian specialist on board Losharik (RBC, July 9, 2019).]


Losharik can also recover the remains of foreign warheads and other weapons systems lost at sea [[Possible targets for Losharik or other Russian retrieval submersibles could be the] US RQ-4 Global Hawk drone...shot down by the Iranians in the Strait of Hormuz in June 2019. The Iranians gathered some floating debris, but there is surely a treasure trove left scattered on the seabed. In April 2019, a Japanese US-made F-35A crashed in the Pacific. Again, some floating debris was recovered, but more valuable technology could still be found underneath (Interfax, April 15).

 Losharik's many mechanical hands/manipulators, floodlights and additional helper submersibles are evident. (Artwork courtesy TechnologyNewsWorld July 2, 2019)
---

Technical Details for Losharikinclude:

Displacement: 1600 tonnes (surfaced), 2100 tonnes (submerged)
Length:            60 m or 70 m (unconfirmed)
Propulsion:      1 nuclear reactor E-17 [details eg. kW or MW, unknown]
Complement:  19 to 25
Estimates Diving Depth:  6,000 metres.

See Submarine Matters'earlier Losharik reporting here.
Pete (with thanks to Starshiy for spotting some references).

Teaching the Russian S-400 to detect F-35s

$
0
0

Franz-Stefan Gady has written an excellent article at the The Diplomat paysite. The article is an interview with Mauro Gilli, a senior researcher in military technology and international security at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. The article titled “Mauro Gilli: Selling the F-35 to Countries Operating the S-400 Is a Bad Idea” is dated July 3, 2019. Subscribers can read the full article at

[Franz-Stefan Gady askes] "How [the Russian S-400 system issue is] related to the sale of the 
F-35 aircraft to countries such as Turkey or, perhaps less realistically, India?

[Mauro Gilli's responds] "To use the previous analogy, by possessing both the F-35 as well as the
S-400, Turkey or India could figure out how to change the color of the F-35 from light blue to black, and in part how to change the color of the background from light blue to white. To put it more precisely, stealth technology is aimed at reducing the observability to radars operating at specific angles and at specific frequencies. By modulating the frequencies and angles of operations of multiple S-400 systems, one could find the weak spots of the F-35 and, more important, its unique radar returns. By feeding such data into signal processing software, the chances of detection increases markedly – one country would be able to more accurately ignore false positives and more carefully avoid false negative[s]. In other words, if you know what you are looking for, you can more easily find it."


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 17, 2019 Al-Monitor.com reported:
The “Trump administration said today it would formally kick Turkey out of the F-35 program after Ankara took delivery of a [S-400] Russian air defense system that could threaten the American fighter’s stealth capabilities.
In a White House statement sent five days after Turkey began taking deliveries of the Moscow-made S-400, [on July 12, 2019] press secretary Stephanie Grisham said the F-35 “cannot coexist with a Russian intelligence collection platform that will be used to learn about its advanced capabilities.”
Pentagon officials had long said the Russian system, which is not compatible with NATO counterparts, could train its powerful radar on any F-35 jet operated by Turkey to uncover its stealth protections....”
Viewing all 2365 articles
Browse latest View live